Supreme Court Directs Preparation of Guidelines for Media Briefings by Police Personnel — Ensuring Fairness and Public Interest in Criminal Investigations. The court mandated the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to formulate guidelines balancing media rights and the rights of the accused and victims.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed significant issues regarding police encounters and media briefings in a batch of cases involving the People's Union for Civil Liberties. The court highlighted the need for a structured procedure for police investigations into encounters, referencing a prior judgment from 2014. It also emphasized the importance of media briefings during ongoing investigations, noting the potential impact of media reporting on public perception and the rights of both the accused and victims. The court appointed Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan as Amicus Curiae to assist in formulating guidelines. The Amicus Curiae circulated a questionnaire to various states and received responses, which informed the court's considerations. The court acknowledged the fundamental right to free speech and expression while also recognizing the competing rights of the accused to a fair trial and the victims' rights to privacy and dignity. It noted the need for a balance between these interests, particularly in cases involving sensitive information. The court directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to prepare a comprehensive manual on media briefings, incorporating suggestions from Directors General of Police and other stakeholders. The exercise was to be completed by December 31, 2023, with a follow-up scheduled for January 2024.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Police Encounters - Investigation Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 - The court addressed the procedure for police encounters, emphasizing the need for a structured approach to ensure fairness in investigations. It highlighted the importance of guidelines to prevent bias and protect the rights of the accused and victims (Paras 1-2).

B) Media Law - Media Briefings - Guidelines for Police - Not mentioned - The court recognized the need for guidelines governing police media briefings to balance the right to information with the rights of the accused and victims. It directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to prepare a comprehensive manual on this issue (Paras 18-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

The procedure to be followed by the police in investigating police encounters and the propriety and procedure of media briefings by police personnel.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to prepare comprehensive guidelines for police media briefings, ensuring a balance between public interest and the rights of the accused and victims. The guidelines were to be formulated after consulting various stakeholders and completed by December 31, 2023.

Law Points

  • police encounters
  • media briefings
  • fair trial
  • presumption of innocence
  • public interest
  • freedom of speech
  • right to life
  • contempt of court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (09) 155

Criminal Appeal No 1255 of 1999

2023-09-13

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Manoj Misra

Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Mr. Dhiraj, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mrs. Anshu Vachher, Mr. Akshat Vachher, Ms. Abhiti Vachher, Mr. P. N. Puri, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Aditya Sharma, Ms. Apurba Pattanayak, Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Shobha Gupta, Mr. Aditya Ranjan, Ms. Jessy Kurian, Ms. Tarjana Rai, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Mr. Bharat Bagla, Mr. Sourav Singh, Mr. Aditya Krishna, Mr. T A Khan, Mr. Wasim Quadri, Ms. Pragya Baghel, Mr. Jayant Mohan, Mr. D. S. Mahra, Mr. Anil K. Chopra, Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Dr. Monika Gusain, Ms. Suvarna Singh, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Ms. Devyani Gupta, Ms. Tanvi Anand, M/S. Corporate Law Group, Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Mr. Krishnam Mishra, Mr. Param Kumar Mishra, Mr. T. Mahipal, Mr. Gopal Singh, Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Ms. G. Indira, Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Mr. Praveen Agrawal, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, M/S. Karanjawala & Co., Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Mr. V. K. Verma, Mr. Rajat Srivastav, Mr. T.C. Kaushik, Mr. Tarun Verma, Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Shibashish Misra, Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Mr. Saumitra Srivastava, Ms. Radhika Gupta, Ms. Ruchira Goel, Mr. Rajiv Kumar Sinha, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Sahni, Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Mr. C Kranthi Kumar, Mr. Naman Dwivedi, Mr. Danish Saifi, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Ms. Rachana Gandhi, Mr. Saurabh Trivedi, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Mr. Aravindh S., Mr. Abbas, Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Mr. Karun Shrama, Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Mr. Anand Kumar Dubey, Mr. Jainendra Ojha, Mr. Simanta Kumar, Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Mr. Suraj Singh, Mr. Bhuwan Chandra, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mr. Subhasish Mohanty, Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Mr. G. Prakash, Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, M/s Arputham Aruna & co., Mr. V.K. Sharma, Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Mr. M.K. Maroria, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Mr. Krishnanand Pandey

People’s Union for Civil Liberties & Anr

The State of Maharashtra & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals and contempt petitions concerning police encounters and media reporting.

Remedy Sought

Guidelines for police media briefings and investigation procedures.

Filing Reason

Concerns regarding the impact of media on police investigations and the rights of accused and victims.

Previous Decisions

The court referred to a prior judgment regarding police encounters and the need for structured procedures.

Issues

What procedure should police follow in investigating encounters? What guidelines should govern media briefings by police?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued for the need for clear guidelines to protect the rights of the accused and victims. The respondents emphasized the importance of media freedom while ensuring fair investigations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for a structured approach to police investigations and media interactions to protect the rights of individuals involved while ensuring public interest is served.

Judgment Excerpts

This batch of cases raises two significant issues: (i) The procedure to be followed by the police in investigating police encounters; and (ii) The propriety and procedure of media briefings by police personnel. The court appointed Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, senior counsel, as Amicus Curiae. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs should prepare a comprehensive manual on media briefings by police personnel.

Procedural History

The case involved multiple criminal appeals and a contempt petition, with the Supreme Court hearing the matters and appointing an Amicus Curiae to assist in formulating guidelines.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Section 3
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 228-A
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: Section 327
  • Juvenile Justice Act, 2015: Section 74
  • Right to Information Act, 2005: Sections 8(1)(g), 8(1)(h), 8(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Lab Assistants Seeking Approval of Appointments in Minority College — Prior Permission Mandatory Despite Minority Status. Condition of prior permission under Circular dated 26.08.2021 applies to all aided col...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Awards for Lack of Valid Arbitration Agreement in Service Dispute. Fraudulent Claims Based on Non-Existent Agreement Cannot Be Enforced; Awards Declared Null and Void.