Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Insurance Assignment Fees — Circular Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. regarding a circular issued by LIC imposing a registration charge of Rs.250 for the assignment of life insurance policies. Dravya Finance challenged this circular in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it was contrary to Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938, and violated Article 265 of the Constitution of India. The High Court ruled that the charge constituted an unconstitutional service fee without legal authority, leading to the circular's annulment. The appellant-insurer contended that the fee was part of a business transaction and necessary to cover administrative costs associated with processing assignments. However, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing that Section 38 did not authorize such a fee and that no regulations or rules permitted the insurer to levy charges for recording assignments. The court noted that the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India had established regulations prohibiting any fees for recording assignments. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling that the insurer could not impose the Rs.250 fee for recording assignments.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Levy of Fees - Unconstitutionality of Circular - Insurance Act, 1938, Section 38 - The High Court held that the levy of Rs.250 for registration of assignment was unconstitutional as there was no authority to impose such a fee, violating Article 265. The circular was struck down for lacking legal backing and being contrary to statutory provisions (Paras 3, 12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-insurer had the lawful authority to levy a service charge of Rs.250 for the transaction of assignment of a life insurance policy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling that the insurer had no right to impose the Rs.250 fee for recording assignments.

Law Points

  • Insurance Act
  • 1938
  • Section 38
  • Life Insurance Corporation Act
  • 1956
  • Section 6
  • Article 265
  • Article 14
  • Article 19(1)(g)
  • Article 300A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (09) 102

Civil Appeal No. 4095 of 2012

2023-09-06

Abhay S. Oka, Sanjay Karol

Life Insurance Corporation of India

Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the legality of a circular imposing fees for insurance policy assignments.

Remedy Sought

Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. sought to strike down the circular imposing a fee.

Filing Reason

The circular was alleged to be contrary to the Insurance Act and unconstitutional.

Previous Decisions

The Bombay High Court ruled the circular unconstitutional, leading to the appeal.

Issues

Lawful authority to levy service charge Constitutionality of the circular

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued the fee was part of a business transaction and necessary for administrative costs. The respondent contended the fee was unconstitutional and lacked legal authority.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer cannot levy fees for recording assignments unless explicitly authorized by law or regulation, as per Section 38 of the Insurance Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The levy of a sum of Rs.250/- for registration of assignment under the impugned circular was the levy of service charge or fee without there being any power to do so. The appellant – insurer had no right to claim fees of Rs.250/- for recording the endorsement of assignment or transfer.

Procedural History

The case was initially filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the circular, which was struck down, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Insurance Act, 1938: Section 38
  • Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956: Section 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Replacement of Machinery and Depreciation Issues Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure on Replacement of Entire Machinery is Capital Expenditure; IFCI Adjustment Not Actual Payment Under Section ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive ...