Supreme Court Directs State to Enhance Support for Child Victims under POCSO Act — Ensures Legal Framework is Effectively Implemented. The court mandated the appointment of support persons as a legal entitlement for child victims, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to bridge the gap between legal provisions and actual support.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the inadequacies in the implementation of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and its associated rules, particularly concerning the role of support persons for child victims. The writ petition arose from the struggles faced by a victim navigating the justice system, highlighting the need for effective support mechanisms. The court noted that while the POCSO Rules, 2020 institutionalized the role of support persons, their appointment remained sporadic and ineffective, with only 4% of cases having a support person assigned. The court underscored the importance of these roles in providing emotional, psychological, and practical assistance to child victims, which is crucial for their recovery and participation in legal proceedings. The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to convene a meeting to assess and enhance the support person framework, ensuring proper guidelines and training for support persons. It mandated that the State file a compliance report by October 4, 2023, and requested the Ministry of Women and Child Development to inform the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to monitor the implementation across states. The judgment emphasized that true justice for child victims involves not only prosecuting offenders but also providing comprehensive support to help them heal and reintegrate into society.

Headnote

A) Child Rights - Support Person Framework - Legal Entitlement - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 39 - The court emphasized that the role of a support person is a legal entitlement for child victims under the POCSO Act, aimed at providing necessary assistance throughout the judicial process. It directed the State to ensure the effective implementation of this framework to bridge the gap between legal provisions and actual support provided to victims (Paras 9-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions for appointing a support person under the POCSO Act and Rules are being effectively implemented.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to convene a meeting to review and enhance the support person framework, ensuring compliance with the POCSO Act and Rules. It mandated a report of compliance by October 4, 2023, and requested the Ministry of Women and Child Development to inform the NCPCR for monitoring purposes.

Law Points

  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act
  • 2012
  • POCSO Rules
  • 2020
  • support person
  • child rights
  • legal entitlement
  • monitoring framework
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (08) 161

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 427 of 2022

2023-08-18

S. Ravindra Bhat, Aravind Kumar

Bachpan Bachao Andolan

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition concerning the implementation of support mechanisms for child victims under the POCSO Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought effective implementation of the support person framework to assist child victims.

Filing Reason

The victim faced hardships in navigating the justice system without adequate support.

Previous Decisions

The court had previously monitored the case through continuing mandamus, noting the lack of support person appointments.

Issues

Effectiveness of support person provisions under POCSO Act Implementation of POCSO Rules, 2020

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the necessity of support persons in all POCSO cases. The respondents were urged to enhance the framework for appointing and training support persons.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the role of a support person is a legal entitlement under the POCSO Act, essential for assisting child victims through the judicial process, and mandated the State to ensure effective implementation of this framework.

Judgment Excerpts

The enactment and bringing into force of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was not merely in furtherance of this country’s commitment to international instruments. The role of a ‘support person’ as envisaged in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 remains unfulfilled.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2022, and the court monitored the case through a series of orders addressing the need for support for child victims.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: Section 39
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 282
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Sections 126, 127
  • Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: Section 3
  • Minimum Wages Act, 1948:
  • Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Supreme Court Sittings in Indore — Jurisdictional Limits of High Court Under Article 226 Affirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Cooperative Society Membership Dispute Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court upheld the appellate authority's order allowing membership transfer, finding that the society's refusal was not ...