Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tender Dispute — Upholds Acceptance of Performance Security Despite Delay Due to Bank Strike. The Court found that the acceptance of the performance security was justified due to circumstances beyond the appellant's control.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute regarding the acceptance of additional performance security in a tender process. The appellant, M/s Om Gurusai Construction Company, was declared the lowest bidder for a construction project by the Executive Engineer, Lower Wardha Project Division, on 12.03.2021. According to Clause 2.22.0 (ix) of the tender conditions, the appellant was required to submit the additional performance security within two working days. However, due to a nationwide bank strike on 15.03.2021 and 16.03.2021, the appellant submitted the security on 17.03.2021. The first respondent challenged the work order in the High Court, which ruled that the acceptance of the security was a breach of the tender conditions. The Supreme Court, upon review, found that the High Court had overstepped by considering the time limit for completion of work, which was not within its purview. The Court held that the tendering authority had acted within its rights to accept the security given the circumstances of the bank strike, thus allowing the appeal and dismissing the writ petition. The Court reiterated that the law does not compel performance of impossible tasks and that the tendering authority's interpretation of the tender conditions was reasonable and not arbitrary.

Headnote

A) Contract Law - Tender Conditions - Compliance with Performance Security - Clause 2.22.0 (ix) of the tender conditions - The court held that the acceptance of the additional performance security on 17.03.2021 was justified due to the nationwide bank strike on 15.03.2021 and 16.03.2021, which rendered compliance impossible within the stipulated time. The court emphasized that the tendering authority acted reasonably in accepting the security after verifying the circumstances (Paras 23-26).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the work order on the ground that the tendering authority breached Clause 2.22.0 (ix) by accepting the additional performance security on 17.03.2021.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and upheld the acceptance of the additional performance security submitted on 17.03.2021, ruling that the tendering authority acted reasonably given the circumstances of the bank strike.

Law Points

  • Tender conditions
  • performance security
  • judicial review
  • public interest
  • impossibility of performance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (08) 141

Civil Appeal No. 5375 of 2023

2023-08-23

K.V. Viswanathan, J., J.K. Maheshwari

Shri Amit K. Pathak, Shri Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, Shri Uday B. Dube

M/s Om Gurusai Construction Company

M/s V.N. Reddy & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the acceptance of additional performance security in a tender process.

Remedy Sought

The first respondent sought to set aside the work order issued to the appellant.

Filing Reason

The first respondent challenged the acceptance of the performance security beyond the stipulated time.

Previous Decisions

The High Court ruled that the acceptance of the performance security was a breach of the tender conditions.

Issues

Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the work order Whether the tendering authority breached Clause 2.22.0 (ix)

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the delay was due to a bank strike, making compliance impossible. The first respondent contended that the tender conditions were mandatory and should not have been relaxed.

Ratio Decidendi

The law does not compel performance of impossible tasks, and the interpretation of tender conditions by the tendering authority should be respected unless proven otherwise.

Judgment Excerpts

The acceptance of the additional performance security on 17.03.2021 was justified due to the nationwide bank strike. The High Court should have confined itself to the examination of the question whether the acceptance of the additional performance security was justified in law.

Procedural History

The appellant was declared the lowest bidder on 12.03.2021, submitted performance security on 17.03.2021 after a bank strike, and the High Court set aside the work order, which was then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXI Rule 84
  • General Clauses Act, 1897: Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Export of Iron Ore from Karnataka Amidst Improved Mining Conditions. The Court recognized significant improvements in mining operations and environmental compliance, leading to the relaxation of previous restrictions on iron ore ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tax Exemption Case for Charitable Institution — Remands for Fresh Decision. The definition of 'charitable purpose' includes education, and charging fees does not negate this under Section 115(4) of the Delhi Municipal...