Supreme Court Issues Guidelines for Court Security and Digitisation — Ensures Safety of Judicial Stakeholders. The court emphasized the need for comprehensive security measures and digitisation of judicial infrastructure to safeguard stakeholders in the justice delivery system.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed critical issues regarding the safety and security of judicial stakeholders in light of recent incidents of violence within court premises. The petitioner, Pradyuman Bisht, filed a writ petition in public interest concerning the installation of CCTV cameras and the need for audio-visual facilities to record evidence during trials. The court noted alarming incidents of gunfire in court premises and the tragic death of a judge in Jharkhand, highlighting the urgent need for improved security measures. The court examined various suggestions from stakeholders and emphasized the necessity of a comprehensive security plan, including the establishment of Court Security Units, installation of CCTV cameras, and the regulation of footfall in court complexes. The court also recognized the need for digitisation of judicial infrastructure, urging High Courts to implement live streaming and recording facilities to enhance the judicial process. The court directed that preliminary action reports on security measures and digitisation be submitted by the High Courts by 10th October 2023 and scheduled further consideration of the matter for 12th October 2023. The court's recommendations aimed to ensure the safety of all stakeholders and facilitate fair access to justice.

Headnote

A) Court Security - Installation of CCTV Cameras - Necessity for Security Measures - Supreme Court of India, 2023 - The court emphasized the need for comprehensive security measures including the installation of CCTV cameras in court complexes to safeguard stakeholders. It held that mere installation is insufficient without a robust security plan and systemic measures to address lapses (Paras 1-10).

B) Digitisation of Judicial Infrastructure - Need for Technological Advancements - Supreme Court of India, 2023 - The court recognized the importance of digitisation in enhancing judicial processes and directed High Courts to implement measures for live streaming and recording trials. It held that such advancements are essential for ensuring safety and effective access to justice (Paras 11-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether adequate security measures and digitisation of judicial infrastructure are necessary to ensure safety within court premises.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court issued guidelines for the implementation of security measures and digitisation of judicial infrastructure, emphasizing the need for timely action and periodic reporting by High Courts.

Law Points

  • Court security
  • CCTV installation
  • digitisation of judicial infrastructure
  • public interest litigation
  • contempt of court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (08) 138

Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 99/2015

2023-08-11

S. Ravindra Bhat, Dipankar Datta

2023 INSC 706

Pradyuman Bisht

Union of India & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public interest litigation concerning court security and digitisation of judicial infrastructure.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought installation of CCTV cameras and audio-visual facilities in court premises.

Filing Reason

Concerns over safety and security of judicial stakeholders following incidents of violence.

Previous Decisions

Various directions issued by the court regarding security measures and digitisation.

Issues

Need for comprehensive security measures in court premises Importance of digitisation of judicial infrastructure

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for immediate implementation of security measures Respondents highlighted existing measures and challenges in implementation

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that comprehensive security measures and digitisation are essential for ensuring the safety of judicial stakeholders and effective access to justice.

Judgment Excerpts

It is appalling that court premises in the national capital itself, in the past year or so, have witnessed at least three major incidents of gunfire. We deem it appropriate considering the aforesaid suggestions and having regard to the concerns and their larger ramifications to lay down the following guidelines in the interest of justice.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2015, with subsequent contempt petitions and special leave petitions arising from the ongoing concerns regarding court security and digitisation.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Restoring Appellate Tribunal's Decision on Land Occupancy Rights. The High Court's reliance on spot inspection over presumptive entries in RTC records was erroneous, leading to the restoration of the Appellat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Assistant Transport Officer for Sexual Harassment Due to Malicious Prosecution. Allegations Found Absurd and Inherently Improbable; FIR Held to be Retaliatory Based on Internal Complaints Found F...