Supreme Court Restores Award for Workmen in Industrial Dispute Case — Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages. The management's challenge to the regularization of services was dismissed as it had voluntarily complied with the Award for 18 years.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the workmen represented by the Executive Staff Union of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and the management regarding the retrenchment of 21 casual workers. The Ministry of Labour referred the industrial dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, which found the retrenchment unjustified and directed reinstatement and regularization of the workers' services. The management challenged this Award in the Jharkhand High Court, which initially upheld the reinstatement but later modified the order to quash the regularization aspect. The Supreme Court was approached by both parties, with the workmen seeking regularization and the management contesting the reinstatement and back wages. The Supreme Court noted that the management had complied with the Award for 18 years, absorbing the workers into regular service, and emphasized the principle of approbate and reprobate, which prevents a party from accepting benefits while simultaneously challenging the basis of those benefits. The Court restored the Tribunal's Award, reinstating the workers and their back wages, and dismissed the management's appeal. The decision underscored the importance of fair play and the consequences of the management's voluntary actions over the years.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Reinstatement and Regularization - Legality of Award - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sections 10, 25F - The Tribunal found the retrenchment of workmen void due to non-compliance with mandatory provisions, directing reinstatement and regularization. The Division Bench modified the order, quashing the regularization aspect, but the Supreme Court restored the Award, emphasizing the management's voluntary compliance over 18 years. Held that the management could not challenge the Award after benefiting from it (Paras 17-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the workmen were entitled to regularization of services and the legality of the Award directing such relief.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Executive Staff Union of FCI, restoring the Award dated 18.03.1997 and the order dated 01.11.2018, thereby upholding the reinstatement and payment of 75% back wages to the workmen. The management's appeal was dismissed.

Law Points

  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Section 10
  • Section 25F
  • compliance with awards
  • regularization of services
  • doctrine of approbate and reprobate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (07) 47

Civil Appeal No. 4152 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3656 of 2021)

2023-07-03

Sanjay Kumar, Krishna Murari

Their Workmen through the Joint Secretary (Welfare), Food Corporation of India Executive Staff Union

Employer in relation to the Management of the Food Corporation of India & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Industrial dispute regarding the retrenchment of casual workers.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the Award directing reinstatement and regularization of services.

Filing Reason

Management's challenge to the Tribunal's Award.

Previous Decisions

The Jharkhand High Court initially upheld the reinstatement but later modified the order regarding regularization.

Issues

Entitlement to regularization of services Legality of the Award directing regularization

Submissions/Arguments

The workmen argued for the legality of their regularization based on long-term compliance. The management contended against the regularization aspect of the Award.

Ratio Decidendi

The management could not challenge the Award after voluntarily complying with it for 18 years, as it would be inequitable to allow them to benefit from the Award while simultaneously contesting its validity.

Judgment Excerpts

The action of the management of FCI in retrenching the services of these workmen was not justified and directed the management to reinstate them and regularize their services. The management of FCI voluntarily chose to implement the Award in its totality, despite the conditional interim protection afforded to it in the writ petition.

Procedural History

The case originated from a reference made under the Industrial Disputes Act, leading to an Award by the Tribunal, followed by a writ petition filed by the management, and subsequent appeals to the Jharkhand High Court and the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 10, Section 25F
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Pension Scheme for Retired Employees of DTC — Upholds High Court's Decision. The court ruled that employees who did not exercise their option for the Pension Scheme are not entitled to benefits under the sc...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India Appeals in Pay Anomaly Case — Upholds High Court's Order for Pay Stepping Up. Citing Fundamental Rule 22, the court found that the stepping up of pay was necessary to rectify the anomaly between senior and jun...