Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Testamentary Matter — No Relief Granted Due to Lack of Evidence. Citing the Destruction of Records Act, 1917, the court found that the original Will's whereabouts were uncertain and the petitioner lacked knowledge of its contents.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This case involved a Special Leave Petition filed by A. Wilson Prince concerning the probate of a Will executed by Rev. Salusbury Fynes Davenport, who died on 24.01.1972. The Will, dated 19.07.1969, appointed M/s King and Partridge as the executor. The executor successfully obtained probate on 29.07.1972, and subsequent records were maintained until they were destroyed in 1998 under the Destruction of Records Act, 1917. In 2016, Smt. Mary Brigit, claiming to be a beneficiary, sought a copy of the probate, leading to a writ petition in 2018 when her request was denied. The High Court upheld the destruction of records and dismissed her petition. The Supreme Court noted that only A. Wilson Prince, a successor of Smt. Mary Brigit, pursued the matter further. The petitioner argued that the original Will should have been preserved and that the respondents were obligated to provide a copy. However, the court found that the original Will's whereabouts were uncertain, and the petitioner lacked direct knowledge of its contents. The court concluded that it could not grant relief based on conjecture and dismissed the petition, affirming the High Court's decision.

Headnote

A) Probate Law - Grant of Probate - Entitlement to Copy of Will - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 222, 272 - The court held that the records pertaining to the probate were destroyed in accordance with the Destruction of Records Act, 1917, and thus no direction could be issued to furnish a copy of the Will. The petitioner failed to demonstrate knowledge of the Will's contents, leading to the dismissal of the petition (Paras 9, 21, 23).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a copy of the Will and probate documents after the records were destroyed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming the High Court's decision that no relief could be granted due to the destruction of records and the petitioner's lack of knowledge regarding the Will's contents.

Law Points

  • Probate
  • Writ Petition
  • Destruction of Records
  • Testamentary Succession
  • Executor's Duties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (05) 195

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.17303 of 2022

2023-05-15

Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

A. Wilson Prince

The Nazar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Special Leave Petition concerning the probate of a Will.

Remedy Sought

A. Wilson Prince sought a copy of the Will and probate documents.

Filing Reason

The original probate records were destroyed, and the petitioner claimed entitlement to the documents.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the records were destroyed and no documents could be provided.

Issues

Entitlement to a copy of the Will and probate documents Effect of the Destruction of Records Act on testamentary documents

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the original Will should have been preserved and that the respondents were obligated to provide a copy. The respondents contended that the records were destroyed in accordance with the law and that the original Will's whereabouts were uncertain.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that without direct knowledge of the Will's contents, the petitioner could not claim entitlement to its copy, especially after the records were destroyed under the Destruction of Records Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The records pertaining to O.P. No.15 of 1972 were destroyed and were not available, no direction of the nature sought in the petition can be issued to furnish a copy of the Will to the petitioners. The court cannot go to the aid of such a person.

Procedural History

The probate was granted on 29.07.1972; a writ petition was filed in 2018; the High Court dismissed the petition; the Special Leave Petition was filed thereafter.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: 222, 272, 317
  • Destruction of Records Act, 1917:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Upheld as Suit Contemplated Urgent Interim Reli...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Acquisition and Compensation for Land Taken for Water Supply Scheme Without Due Process. Court Considers Whether Gram Panchayat or Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran Was the Acquiring Body and Relies on Supre...