Supreme Court Modifies Order Allowing Withdrawal of Funds in Financial Dispute — Appellant Permitted to Withdraw Amount with Interest. Citing earlier orders, the court found the bank guarantee condition unnecessary.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a financial matter involving the appellant, M/S. Jermyn Capital LLC Dubai, and the Central Bureau of Investigation. The appellant sought modification of a Supreme Court order dated 09.05.2023, which had allowed the appeal but imposed a condition requiring a bank guarantee for the release of ₹38.52 crore. The appellant presented various orders from the Securities Appellate Tribunal and the Supreme Court, which directed that the sale proceeds be placed in fixed deposits to earn higher interest. The court reviewed these orders and decided to modify the earlier ruling. The final order allowed the appellant to withdraw the funds unconditionally, along with the interest accrued from the fixed deposits. The court concluded that the previous condition of a bank guarantee was no longer necessary, thus modifying the order accordingly. The application for modification was allowed, and the matter was disposed of as per the modified terms.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Modification of Court Order - Withdrawal of Funds - Supreme Court of India, 2023 - The appellant sought modification of a prior order requiring a bank guarantee for fund release. The court allowed the modification, permitting unconditional withdrawal of the amount along with accrued interest. Held that the previous conditions were no longer necessary (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the condition imposed on the appellant to furnish a bank guarantee for the release of funds should be modified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the modification of the order, permitting the appellant to withdraw the amount of ₹38.52 crore along with accrued interest without the need for a bank guarantee.

Law Points

  • Modification of court order
  • withdrawal of funds
  • bank guarantee
  • interest on deposits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (05) 183

Miscellaneous Application No. 1278 of 2023 in Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2023

2023-05-17

KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KUMAR

Mukul Rohatgi, Sunil Fernandes, Nupur Kumar, Divyansh Tiwari, M. Thangathurai, Priyansha Sharma, Diksha Dadu, K M Nataraj, Rajesh Ranjan, Mukul Singh, Shailesh Madiyal, Pratyush Shrivastav, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Swati Ghildiyal, Devyani Bhatt, K J John And Co

M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Modification of a prior court order regarding financial release conditions.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the order requiring a bank guarantee for fund release.

Filing Reason

To allow unconditional withdrawal of funds along with accrued interest.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 09.05.2023 imposed a bank guarantee condition for fund release.

Issues

Modification of court order regarding financial conditions Unconditional withdrawal of funds

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for modification of the bank guarantee condition based on previous orders. Respondents did not contest the modification of the order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the condition for a bank guarantee was unnecessary given the context of previous orders and allowed the appellant to withdraw the funds unconditionally.

Judgment Excerpts

IA No. 100413/2023 is allowed and, in consequence, M.A. No. 1278/2023 stands disposed of. As a consequence, the appellant shall be permitted to unconditionally withdraw the aforesaid amount along with the fixed deposit interest amount that has accrued thereon.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a miscellaneous application seeking modification of the Supreme Court's order dated 09.05.2023, which was heard on 17.05.2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Special Area Development Authority's Power to Levy Property Tax — Clarifies Taxation Powers Under Municipal Laws.
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Examines Canara Bank's Unauthorised Recovery of Excess Pension from Widow's Family Pension Account. The Court Noted the Bank's Arbitrary Conduct in Withholding Pension and Debiting Funds Without Due Process, Emphasising the Need ...