Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case — NCLAT's Dismissal on Limitation Set Aside. The NCLAT erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds as the appellant's application for a certified copy was made within the limitation period, allowing for exclusion of that time.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which dismissed the appellant's appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order on the grounds of limitation. The appellant had filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) in June 2021, which was dismissed by the NCLT on 26 August 2022. The appellant sought a certified copy of the order on 2 September 2022, which was received on 15 September 2022. The appeal to the NCLAT was filed on 10 October 2022, which the NCLAT deemed to be beyond the 30-day limitation period, excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy. The appellant contended that the appeal was filed within the limitation period as the order was made available on 15 September 2022. The NCLAT, however, calculated the limitation period from the date of the NCLT's order and concluded that the appeal was filed on the 46th day, exceeding the outer limit of 45 days. The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of the IBC and the Limitation Act, emphasizing that the time taken to obtain a certified copy should be excluded from the limitation period. The court found that the NCLAT had erred in its calculation and that the appellant had acted diligently in applying for the certified copy. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLAT's order, and restored the appeal for disposal on merits.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Limitation for Appeals - Computation of Limitation Period - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The court held that the NCLAT erred in dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation, as the appellant's application for a certified copy was made within the limitation period, and the time taken to provide the copy should be excluded from the computation of limitation. The appeal was thus filed within the permissible period. (Paras 29-30).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal was filed within the period of limitation as prescribed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLAT's order dated 9 January 2023, and restored the appeal for disposal on merits.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Limitation
  • E-filing
  • Certified Copy Requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (05) 138

Civil Appeal No 748 of 2023

2023-05-01

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.B. Pardiwala

Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Mr. Vp Singh, Mr. Akshat Singh, Ms. Dacchita Shahi, Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi, Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Ms. Rashi Bansal

Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr

APG Logistics Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the appeal for disposal on merits.

Filing Reason

The appeal was dismissed by NCLAT on grounds of limitation.

Previous Decisions

NCLAT dismissed the appeal on 9 January 2023.

Issues

Whether the appeal was filed within the limitation period Whether the time taken to obtain a certified copy should be excluded from the limitation period

Submissions/Arguments

The NCLAT should have excluded the period taken to obtain a certified copy The NCLAT erroneously calculated the limitation period without considering the exclusion of the date of pronouncement

Ratio Decidendi

The time taken to obtain a certified copy of the order is to be excluded from the limitation period for filing an appeal under the IBC, and the appeal was filed within the permissible time frame.

Judgment Excerpts

The NCLAT was in error in dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation. The explanation which was advanced by the appellant for condoning the period of 5 days was, in our view, sufficient.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application under Section 7 of the IBC in June 2021, which was dismissed by NCLT on 26 August 2022. The appellant sought a certified copy on 2 September 2022, received it on 15 September 2022, and filed an appeal on 10 October 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61, Section 238A
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution Proceedings Upholding Auction Sale Despite Procedural Objections. Court affirmed that under Order 21 Rule 90 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, setting aside a court sale requires specific pleading and proof...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Cases Due to Serious Charges and Procedural Irregularities. The High Court's grant of bail was found to disregard the gravity of the charges and the accused's criminal history.