Supreme Court Restores Proceedings for Fresh Adjudication in Insolvency Case — Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act. The court held that the provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to IBC proceedings, allowing acknowledgment of debt to extend limitation.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the rejection of an application by the State Bank of India under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited, which was classified as a Non-Performing Asset on 10 June 2014. The appellant claimed a default in repayment of approximately Rs 189 crores as of 30 June 2018, while the application was filed on 19 September 2018. The National Company Law Tribunal rejected the application on the grounds of limitation, stating that the right to apply had accrued beyond three years from the date of default. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that the date of default could not be shifted and that the acknowledgment in the balance sheet did not extend the limitation period. The Supreme Court, however, found that the provisions of Section 18 of the Limitation Act were applicable to IBC proceedings and that an acknowledgment in a balance sheet could extend the limitation period if made within three years from the date of default. The court restored the proceedings to the NCLT for fresh adjudication, allowing all rights and contentions of the parties to be considered. The NCLT was directed to dispose of the application expeditiously within three months from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Limitation for Filing Application - Applicability of Limitation Act - The provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court clarified that an acknowledgment in a balance sheet can extend the limitation period if made within three years from the date of default. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was restored to the NCLT for fresh adjudication (Paras 13-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was barred by limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgments of the NCLT and NCLAT, and restored the proceedings to the NCLT for fresh adjudication, directing expeditious disposal within three months.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Limitation Act
  • Acknowledgment of Debt
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Non-Performing Asset
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (04) 166

Civil Appeal No 910 of 2021

2022-04-18

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant

Mr Niranjan Reddy, Mr Shyam Divan

State Bank of India

Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

State Bank of India sought initiation of CIRP against Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited.

Filing Reason

Alleged default in repayment of financial debt.

Previous Decisions

NCLT and NCLAT rejected the application on grounds of limitation.

Issues

Whether the application under Section 7 of the IBC was barred by limitation. Applicability of Section 18 of the Limitation Act to IBC proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that acknowledgments in the balance sheet extended the limitation period. The respondent contended that the application was filed beyond the limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The provisions of the Limitation Act, particularly Section 18, are applicable to proceedings under the IBC, allowing for acknowledgment of debt to extend the limitation period.

Judgment Excerpts

The provisions of Section 18 of the Limitation Act are not alien to and are applicable to proceedings under the IBC. An acknowledgment in a balance sheet without a qualification can furnish a legitimate basis for determining as to whether the period of limitation would stand extended.

Procedural History

The NCLT rejected the application on 16 September 2020, which was upheld by the NCLAT on 17 November 2020. The Supreme Court heard the appeal and restored the matter for fresh adjudication.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Police Act. Externment Orders Under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Set Aside as Show Cause Notices Were Vague and Authorit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother-in-Law's Revision Against Order Denying Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC, Holding Provision Exhaustive and Not Applicable to Mother-in-Law. Applicant Mother-in-Law Not Entitled to Claim Maintenance from Daughters-...