Supreme Court Directs Consideration of Mercy Petition Despite Pending Appeals. The court emphasized that the pending appeals of co-accused should not delay the consideration of the petitioner's mercy petition under Article 72 of the Constitution.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by the petitioner, who was sentenced to death for the assassination of the then Chief Minister of Punjab, along with co-accused. The petitioner did not appeal his death sentence, while the co-accused successfully had their death sentence commuted to life imprisonment. The petitioner sought the commutation of his death sentence based on a communication from the Ministry of Home Affairs proposing special remission for prisoners. The court noted that the petitioner’s mercy petition had been pending since 2012 and that the authorities had not acted on it due to the pending appeals of the co-accused. The court emphasized that the pending appeals of the co-accused should not affect the consideration of the petitioner’s mercy petition. The court directed the concerned authorities to consider the mercy petition without delay and preferably within two months, setting a date for further consideration. The court's decision underscored the importance of addressing the mercy petition independently of the status of co-accused appeals.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Mercy Petition - Consideration of Mercy Petition - Article 72 of the Constitution of India - The court directed that the mercy petition of the petitioner be considered without being influenced by the pending appeals of co-accused, emphasizing that the absence of an appeal by the petitioner does not preclude the consideration of his mercy petition. Held that the authorities must act on the mercy petition expeditiously (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the mercy petition of the petitioner should be considered despite the pending appeals of co-accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed that the mercy petition of the petitioner be considered without being influenced by the pending appeals of the co-accused, and that a decision be taken preferably within two months.

Law Points

  • Commutation of death sentence
  • Mercy petition
  • Article 72 of the Constitution
  • Pending appeals
  • Authority to consider remission
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 240

Writ Petition (Criminal) No.261 of 2020

2022-05-02

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Balwant Singh

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition concerning the commutation of a death sentence.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought the commutation of his death sentence to life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

The petitioner filed the writ petition due to alleged inaction by authorities regarding his mercy petition.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner did not appeal his death sentence, while the co-accused had their death sentence commuted.

Issues

Whether the mercy petition should be considered despite pending appeals of co-accused. The relevance of the petitioner's lack of appeal on the consideration of his mercy petition.

Submissions/Arguments

The mercy petition should be considered only after the disposal of co-accused appeals. The respondents were obliged to consider the mercy petition despite the pending appeals.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the pending appeals of co-accused do not affect the consideration of the petitioner's mercy petition under Article 72 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner along with co-accused was tried in respect of offences punishable under Sections 302/307/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. The High Court found substance in the appeal preferred by the co-accused Jagtar Singh Hawara and substituted the death sentence to imprisonment for life.

Procedural History

The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to death, did not appeal the sentence, and subsequently filed a writ petition regarding the consideration of his mercy petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 302, 307, 120-B
  • Explosive Substances Act: Sections 3, 4
  • Constitution of India: Article 72
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Supply of Gloves — Restores Arbitral Award with 18% Interest. The Commercial Court's interference with the arbitral award on interest rate and remand for quantification wa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 376, 341, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.