Supreme Court Clarifies Senior Advocate Designation Criteria — Adjusts Marks Allocation. The court modified the marks allocation for Senior Advocate designation to reflect years of practice more accurately.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed several miscellaneous applications concerning the designation of Senior Advocates. The applications were filed by various petitioners, including Indira Jaising, who sought clarifications on the allocation of marks for Senior Advocate designation based on years of practice. The core issue revolved around the interpretation of a previous judgment dated 12.10.2017, which stipulated a maximum of ten marks for counsel with ten to twenty years of practice. Jaising argued that this did not adequately reflect the experience of those with more years of practice within that range. The Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta, suggested that the entire concept of marks allocation might require reconsideration. The court allowed him time to submit a written response and directed that responses from other parties be submitted shortly thereafter. However, the court found no reason to defer the matter regarding Jaising's request and clarified that marks should be allocated commensurate with the years of practice, granting her prayer for modification. This adjustment was to take effect immediately. The court also disposed of a similar application by Sidharth Luthra, granting the same relief. The matters were scheduled for further consideration on 12.05.2022.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Senior Advocate Designation - Marks Allocation - Supreme Court of India, 2022 - The court clarified that one mark each should be allocated for every year of practice between ten to twenty years for Senior Advocate designation, modifying previous guidelines. This adjustment was made to ensure fair recognition of counsel's experience, effective from the date of the order. Held that the modification aligns with the standing of the counsel at the Bar (Paras 4-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the allocation of marks for Senior Advocate designation should be adjusted based on years of practice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court clarified that one mark each should be allocated for every year of practice between ten to twenty years for Senior Advocate designation, modifying previous guidelines. This adjustment was made effective immediately.

Law Points

  • Senior Advocate designation
  • marks allocation
  • judicial clarification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 222

Writ Petition (Civil) No.687 of 2021 and others

2022-05-04

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Indira Jaising, Tushar Mehta, Sidharth Luthra

Amar Vivek Aggarwal & Ors., Mandeep Singh Sachdev, Indira Jaising, Dev Krishna Gaur

High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Ors., Supreme Court of India & Ors., Rajasthan High Court

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Clarification regarding the designation of Senior Advocates and allocation of marks.

Remedy Sought

Indira Jaising sought clarification and modification of marks allocation for Senior Advocate designation.

Filing Reason

To address perceived inequities in the marks allocation system for Senior Advocates.

Previous Decisions

The court had previously set guidelines for marks allocation in a judgment dated 12.10.2017.

Issues

Whether the allocation of marks for Senior Advocate designation should be adjusted based on years of practice.

Submissions/Arguments

Indira Jaising argued for a more equitable marks allocation based on years of practice. Tushar Mehta suggested reconsideration of the marks allocation concept.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for fair recognition of counsel's experience in the allocation of marks for Senior Advocate designation.

Judgment Excerpts

The marks be allocated commensurate with the standing of the person at the Bar, that is to say, one mark each shall be allocated for every year of practice between ten to twenty years.

Procedural History

Multiple miscellaneous applications were filed concerning the designation of Senior Advocates, leading to the court's clarification on marks allocation.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Income Tax Matter — Taxation of Capital Gains Affirmed. The court found that the agreement to sell did not constitute a transfer of capital assets under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Family Dispute Over Alleged Forgery and Withdrawal of Funds. Court exercised powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to quash proceedings based on FSL report showing disputed...