Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail in Criminal Case Amidst Allegations of Political Vendetta. Delay in Implication and Nature of Allegations Considered for Granting Bail.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dealt with two writ petitions filed by the petitioner seeking interim bail in relation to multiple FIRs, particularly focusing on FIR No. 70 of 2020. The petitioner contended that he was facing 87 criminal cases, with 84 filed after the current government took power in 2017, alleging political vendetta. The petitioner had secured bail in 84 cases but faced delays in three others. The court noted that the petitioner was not named in FIR No. 70 of 2020, which was filed on 18 March 2020, and a chargesheet was submitted on 10 September 2020, implicating him only after a significant delay. The court highlighted the need for personal liberty and the implications of political motivations behind the FIRs. The court granted interim bail, directing the petitioner to file for regular bail within two weeks, while ensuring that the interim bail would continue until the regular bail application was decided. The court dismissed the other reliefs sought in the writ petition, emphasizing the need for the competent court to decide on the merits of the regular bail application without influence from the current order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Interim Bail - Grant of Interim Bail - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 173(8) - The court granted interim bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 70 of 2020, considering the peculiar facts of the case, including the delay in implicating the petitioner and the nature of allegations. The court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the need for expeditious disposal of bail applications (Paras 24-26).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim bail in light of the allegations and circumstances surrounding FIR No. 70 of 2020.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court partly allowed the writ petition, granting interim bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 70 of 2020, directing him to file for regular bail within two weeks, and ensuring the interim bail would continue until the regular bail application was decided.

Law Points

  • Interim bail
  • Political vendetta
  • Personal liberty
  • Charge sheet
  • Criminal procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 214

I.A. No.71580 of 2022 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.39 of 2022

2022-05-19

L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna

Kapil Sibal, S.V. Raju

Mohammad Azam Khan

The State of Uttar Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for interim bail in multiple criminal cases.

Remedy Sought

Interim bail and quashing of proceedings in FIR No. 70 of 2020.

Filing Reason

Allegations of political vendetta and delays in bail applications.

Previous Decisions

Petitioner had secured bail in 84 out of 87 cases.

Issues

Entitlement to interim bail Political motivations behind FIRs

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued political vendetta and delays in bail applications. State opposed bail, citing the petitioner's political influence and threats to the I.O.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the need for expeditious disposal of bail applications, particularly in cases where political motivations may influence the legal process.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail in respect of FIR being Case Crime No.70 of 2020. The interim bail granted to the petitioner by the present order shall continue to operate till the decision of the Competent Court.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition (Criminal) No.39 of 2022 on 22 January 2022, seeking interim bail. The matter was disposed of on 8 February 2022. Subsequent applications were filed, leading to the current proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 420, 120B
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 173(8)
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Section 13(1)
  • Prevention of Damage to the Public Property Act, 1984: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appeals in Temple Management Dispute — Sovereign Rights of Ruler Affirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Decree Without Amending Judgment in Execution Proceedings — Order-XX Rule 6 CPC. The Court held that a decree can be amended to correct property description without amending the judgment, as per Order-XX Rule 6...