Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petitions for Special Stray Round of NEET-PG-2021 Admissions — Upholds Decision on Vacant Seats. The court ruled that conducting further counselling would compromise medical education and public health.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed a group of writ petitions and special leave petitions concerning the admissions for NEET-PG-2021. The petitioners, including Dr. Astha Goel and others, sought directions for a Special Stray Round of counselling to fill 1456 vacant seats after multiple rounds of counselling. The NEET-PG examination had 40,000 seats available, with an initial eligibility of 92,000 candidates, later increased by 25,000. The counselling process was modified to include four rounds, but despite this, many seats, particularly in non-clinical courses, remained vacant. The petitioners argued that the remaining seats should be filled to prevent wastage and allow candidates to gain admission. The Union of India and the Medical Counselling Committee opposed the petitions, stating that the seats were often non-takers and that conducting further rounds would disrupt the admission schedule for NEET-PG-2022. The court noted that the admission process must adhere to a strict timeline to maintain the quality of medical education and public health. Citing previous judgments, the court emphasized that merely having vacant seats does not justify additional counselling rounds. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petitions, ruling that the decision not to conduct a Special Stray Round was not arbitrary and was in the interest of public health and medical education.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Relief for Special Stray Round of Counselling - Article 32 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners sought a writ to conduct a Special Stray Round for vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats, arguing that 1456 seats remained unfilled after multiple counselling rounds. The court held that conducting further counselling would compromise medical education and public health, thus denying the relief sought (Paras 11-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to direct the respondents to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling for vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions and special leave petitions, ruling that conducting a Special Stray Round of counselling would compromise medical education and public health. The court emphasized adherence to the established admission schedule.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • NEET-PG admissions
  • counselling rounds
  • public health
  • medical education
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (06) 30

Writ Petition (C) No. 409 of 2022 and others

2022-06-10

M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose

Rachna Shrivastava, A.D.N. Rao, Avijit Mani Tripathi, Kunal Cheema, Balbir Singh, Gaurav Sharma

Dr. Astha Goel and Ors., Dr. Atharv Tungatkar and Ors., Dr. Nikhil Arora, Dr. Khundongbam Chetan

The Medical Counselling Committee & Ors., Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions and special leave petitions regarding NEET-PG-2021 admissions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed 1456 seats remained vacant after multiple counselling rounds.

Previous Decisions

High Courts dismissed earlier petitions for similar relief.

Issues

Whether the court should direct a Special Stray Round of counselling for vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats. Whether the decision not to conduct further counselling was arbitrary.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that 1456 vacant seats should be filled to prevent wastage. Respondents contended that many vacant seats are non-takers and conducting further rounds would disrupt the admission schedule.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the admission process must adhere to a strict timeline to maintain the quality of medical education and public health, and that merely having vacant seats does not justify additional counselling rounds.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners sought a writ to conduct a Special Stray Round for vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats. The decision of the Union Government and the Medical Counselling Committee not to have Special Stray Round of counselling is in the interest of Medical Education and Public Health.

Procedural History

The case involved multiple writ petitions and special leave petitions concerning NEET-PG-2021 admissions, with earlier petitions dismissed by High Courts.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI's Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Settlement Applications. SEBI's refusal to condone delay in filing settlement applications under SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Part on Reimbursement of Expenses Taxability Under Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reimbursement of Actual Expenses Not Taxable as Income, but Interest Under Section 234B is Mandatory.