Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petitions for NEET-PG-2021 Admissions Due to Vacant Seats. Conducting Additional Counselling Would Compromise Medical Education Integrity and Public Health.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed a series of writ petitions and special leave petitions concerning the admissions for NEET-PG-2021, where the petitioners sought to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling for approximately 1456 vacant seats after multiple rounds of counselling. The NEET-PG examination had around 40,000 seats available, with an initial eligibility of 92,000 candidates, later increased by 25,000. The counselling process was modified to include four rounds, with the last round concluding on 07.05.2022. Despite the extensive counselling, a significant number of seats remained unfilled, primarily in non-clinical courses. The petitioners argued that the vacant seats should be filled to prevent wastage and allow candidates to gain admission. They contended that the Medical Counselling Committee had a duty to conduct an additional round of counselling, especially given the clinical nature of many vacant seats. The Union of India and the Medical Counselling Committee opposed the petitions, asserting that the remaining seats were often non-taker seats and that conducting further counselling would disrupt the admission process for NEET-PG-2022, which was already underway. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the established time schedule for admissions to maintain the quality of medical education and public health. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petitions, ruling that granting the requested relief could adversely affect the integrity of medical education and public health.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Relief for Vacant Seats - Article 32 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners sought a writ to direct the Medical Counselling Committee to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling for vacant NEET-PG-2021 seats. The court held that conducting additional counselling would compromise the integrity of medical education and public health, thus denying the relief sought (Paras 11-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to direct the respondents to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling for NEET-PG-2021 vacant seats.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions and special leave petitions, ruling that conducting a Special Stray Round of counselling would compromise the integrity of medical education and public health. The court emphasized the need to adhere to the established admission schedule.

Law Points

  • Article 32 of the Constitution of India
  • NEET-PG admissions
  • counselling rounds
  • public health
  • medical education integrity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (06) 27

Writ Petition (C) No. 409 of 2022 and others

2022-06-10

M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose

Rachna Shrivastava, A.D.N. Rao, Avijit Mani Tripathi, Kunal Cheema, Balbir Singh, Gaurav Sharma

Dr. Astha Goel and Ors., Dr. Atharv Tungatkar and Ors., Dr. Nikhil Arora, Dr. Khundongbam Chetan

The Medical Counselling Committee & Ors., Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions and special leave petitions regarding NEET-PG-2021 admissions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus to conduct a Special Stray Round of counselling.

Filing Reason

To fill vacant seats after multiple rounds of counselling.

Previous Decisions

High Courts dismissed earlier petitions for similar relief.

Issues

Whether the court should direct a Special Stray Round of counselling for NEET-PG-2021 vacant seats. The impact of conducting additional counselling on the integrity of medical education and public health.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that 1456 vacant seats should be filled to prevent wastage and allow candidates admission. Respondents contended that many vacant seats are non-taker seats and conducting further counselling would disrupt the NEET-PG-2022 admission process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the integrity of medical education and public health must be maintained, and conducting additional counselling after multiple rounds would not be justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The decision of the Union Government and the Medical Counselling Committee not to have Special Stray Round of counselling is in the interest of Medical Education and Public Health. Even if some seats remain vacant, the students cannot be admitted mid-term.

Procedural History

The petitions were filed after the High Courts dismissed earlier petitions for similar relief regarding NEET-PG-2021 admissions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Arbitration and Stamp Act Dispute - Arbitral Tribunal Has Power to Impound Insufficiently Stamped Documents. The Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal, being a person having authority to receive evidence, is em...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI's Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Settlement Applications. SEBI's refusal to condone delay in filing settlement applications under SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Re...