Supreme Court Allows Employee's Appeal in Industrial Disputes Case Due to Misapplication of Law by High Court. Employee Entitled to Full Wages from Reinstatement Order to Actual Reinstatement Date under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by an employee against a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which set aside an order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) that had awarded back wages. The appellant was dismissed from service in 1996 and reinstated by the CGIT in 2007 with partial back wages. The High Court later reduced the back wages, leading to further appeals. The appellant sought full wages from the date of the CGIT's award until actual reinstatement in 2013. The High Court ruled against the CGIT's order, stating it lacked jurisdiction under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The appellant contended that the CGIT's order had attained finality and that the High Court misapplied precedents. The bank argued that the stay on the CGIT's order negated the claim for back wages. The Supreme Court found that the order of reinstatement was confirmed and that the employee should not suffer due to the bank's stay. The Court ruled that the appellant was entitled to full wages from the date of the CGIT's award to the actual reinstatement date, minus any amounts already paid under Section 17B. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Reinstatement and Back Wages - Entitlement to Wages - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2) - Court held that the appellant was entitled to full wages from the date of reinstatement order to actual reinstatement, after adjusting amounts paid under Section 17B, as the order of reinstatement had attained finality. (Paras 8-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant shall be entitled to the full wages from the date of award of reinstatement i.e., 18.07.2007 passed by the CGIT to the actual date of reinstatement i.e., 23.09.2013?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order and held that the appellant was entitled to full wages from 18.07.2007 to 23.09.2013, after adjusting amounts paid under Section 17B.

Law Points

  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Section 33-C(2)
  • reinstatement
  • back wages
  • principle of merger
  • stay order
  • last drawn wages
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (12) 119

Civil Appeal No. 9008 of 2022 (@ SLP(C) No. 18635 of 2022)

2022-12-12

M. R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar

Shri Shailesh Madiyal, Shri Rajesh Kumar Gautam

D.N. Krishnappa

The Deputy General Manager

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's order setting aside CGIT's award for back wages.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought full wages from the date of reinstatement order to actual reinstatement.

Filing Reason

The High Court set aside the CGIT's order, leading to the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The CGIT's reinstatement order was confirmed by the High Court but modified regarding back wages.

Issues

Entitlement to back wages from the date of the CGIT's award to actual reinstatement Jurisdiction of CGIT under Section 33-C(2)

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for entitlement to full wages based on finality of reinstatement order. Respondent bank argued that stay orders negated the claim for back wages.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the employee is entitled to back wages as the order of reinstatement had attained finality, and the stay order does not negate the entitlement to wages.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court allowing the writ petition preferred by the respondent – bank and quashing and setting aside the order passed by the CGIT under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act directing the bank to pay the wages from 18.07.2007 to 23.09.2013 is unsustainable. It is held that the appellant shall be entitled to the full wages with all emoluments from the date of order of reinstatement i.e., 18.07.2007 to the date of actual reinstatement i.e., 23.09.2013.

Procedural History

The appellant was dismissed in 1996, reinstated by CGIT in 2007, High Court modified back wages in 2013, and the appellant filed for back wages leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 33-C(2), Section 10(2)(a), Section 17B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Land Acquisition Award Due to Non-Joinder of Acquiring Body and Remands for De Novo Consideration. The acquiring body, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, was not impleaded as a party in reference proceedings und...