Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Regarding RTI Application on Collegium Decisions — No Final Decision Taken. CPIO's Denial Upheld as No Formal Resolution Existed.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dealt with a petition for Special Leave to Appeal against the dismissal of a Letters Patent Appeal by the High Court of Delhi. The appellant, Anjali Bhardwaj, sought information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 regarding the decisions taken in a Collegium meeting held on December 12, 2018. The CPIO had denied the request, stating that no final decisions were made during that meeting. The First Appellate Authority upheld this decision, and the learned Single Judge of the High Court confirmed it, emphasizing that the Collegium's discussions did not culminate in a formal resolution. The petitioner argued that certain decisions were indeed made and should be disclosed, referencing a media article and a prior resolution from October 3, 2017, which mandated the uploading of Collegium decisions. The Supreme Court, however, clarified that until a final decision is reached and a resolution is signed, discussions remain tentative and are not subject to disclosure under the RTI Act. The court reiterated that only finalized resolutions are to be made public, leading to the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition.

Headnote

A) Right to Information - Disclosure of Collegium Decisions - No Final Decision Taken - Right to Information Act, 2005, Section 8 - The court held that discussions in the Collegium do not constitute final decisions unless a resolution is formally drawn and signed. Since no final decision was taken in the meeting held on 12.12.2018, the information sought was not required to be disclosed under the RTI Act. (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the decisions taken in the Collegium meeting held on 12.12.2018 were required to be disclosed under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming that no final decision was taken in the Collegium meeting held on 12.12.2018, and thus, the information sought was not required to be disclosed under the RTI Act.

Law Points

  • Right to Information
  • Collegium System
  • Final Decision Requirement
  • RTI Act
  • 2005
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (12) 73

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 21019 of 2022

2022-12-09

M. R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar

Prashant Bhushan

Anjali Bhardwaj

CPIO, Supreme Court of India, (RTI Cell)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal regarding denial of RTI application.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought disclosure of decisions taken in a Collegium meeting.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was dissatisfied with the High Court's dismissal of her appeal.

Previous Decisions

The High Court upheld the denial of information based on the absence of a final decision.

Issues

Disclosure of Collegium decisions under RTI Finality of decisions in Collegium meetings

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that decisions were made and should be disclosed. The respondent maintained that no final decision was taken.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that discussions in the Collegium do not constitute final decisions unless a formal resolution is drawn and signed, and only finalized resolutions are subject to disclosure under the RTI Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The actual resolution passed by the Collegium only can be said to be a final decision of the Collegium. Only after the final resolution is drawn and signed by the members of the Collegium, which is always after completing the due procedure...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an RTI application, which was denied by the CPIO. The First Appellate Authority upheld the denial, and the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, which was confirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Information Act, 2005: Section 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Bail Orders in Serious IPC Offences Case — High Court's Non-Application of Mind Found.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice Against Tenants in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Notice Issued Without Hearing Tenants Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Section 264(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 Requires Not...