Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Advocate on Record Rules — Upholds Exclusive Rights for Advocates on Record. The court found that the Rules were valid under Article 145 and did not violate the Advocates Act, 1961.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by Nandini Sharma challenging certain Rules of the Supreme Court that conferred exclusive rights to Advocates on Record (AOR). The petitioner argued that these Rules were unreasonable, discriminatory, and violated her rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court, while condoning a delay in refiling, examined the constitutionality of the Rules under Article 145 and the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961. The court noted that the classification of Advocates into AOR and Non-AOR was upheld in previous judgments, including those from the Delhi High Court and this court itself. The petitioner contended that the AOR system was unnecessary and that the Supreme Court's power under Article 145 should not restrict the practice of law. However, the court emphasized that the Rules were a form of subordinate legislation and that the court's role was not to question their wisdom unless they were found to be unreasonable or arbitrary. The court ultimately dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the AOR system and indicating that any grievances against specific Advocates could be addressed through appropriate legal channels.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Judicial Review of Legislation - Standards for Validating Subordinate Legislation - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32, Article 145 - The court held that it does not sit as an appellate forum to question the wisdom of legislation unless it is afflicted with known vices. The petitioner’s challenge to the Rules was dismissed as it did not meet the threshold for invalidation. (Paras 10-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Rules conferring exclusive rights to Advocates on Record are unreasonable and discriminatory.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the Rules conferring exclusive rights to Advocates on Record under Article 145 of the Constitution and the Advocates Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Judicial review
  • Article 32
  • Article 145
  • Advocates Act
  • 1961
  • Rule validity
  • Subordinate legislation
  • Reasonableness of rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (11) 180

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1087 of 2022

2022-11-16

K. M. Joseph, Hrishikesh Roy

Radhika Gautam

Nandini Sharma & Anr.

Registrar Supreme Court of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of certain Rules of the Supreme Court regarding Advocates on Record.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to declare the impugned Rules void.

Filing Reason

Alleged unreasonableness and discrimination of the Rules.

Previous Decisions

Previous judgments upheld the classification of Advocates into AOR and Non-AOR.

Issues

Validity of Rules conferring exclusive rights to Advocates on Record Reasonableness of the Advocate on Record system

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Rules were unreasonable and discriminatory. Respondent contended that the Rules were valid under Article 145 and the Advocates Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Rules made under Article 145 of the Constitution are valid and do not infringe upon the rights of Advocates as long as they are not unreasonable or arbitrary.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of 11 days in refiling the writ petition stands condoned. The petitioner who has filed the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India lays a challenge to the Rule mentioned in the prayers. The court held that it does not sit as an appellate forum to question the wisdom of legislation unless it is afflicted with known vices.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging specific Rules of the Supreme Court regarding Advocates on Record.

Acts & Sections

  • Advocates Act, 1961: Section 30, Section 52
  • Constitution of India: Article 32, Article 145
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order on IFS Promotions — Upholds Regulatory Compliance. The High Court's direction for adjustment of officers was found to be unsustainable as it exceeded jurisdiction without challenging the review committee's rec...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Dismissal of Employee for Negligence in Duty — Upholds Disciplinary Authority's Findings. The High Court's interference was deemed inappropriate as it attempted to reassess evidence and substitute punishment without proper gr...