Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions Concerning Succession to Properties of Former Ruler of Faridkot State — Validity of Wills and Rule of Primogeniture Examined.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose over the succession to properties left by Raja Harinder Singh, the former ruler of Faridkot State, following his death in 1989. The parties involved included his daughters, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, Maharani Deepinder Kaur, and Rajkumari Maheepinder Kaur, along with other relatives and a Trust. The litigation centered on the validity of several wills executed by the Ruler, particularly a Third Will dated 01.06.1982, which purportedly bequeathed the estate to a Trust. The Trial Court found the Third Will to be invalid due to suspicious circumstances and ruled in favor of Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, granting her a share of the estate. The High Court upheld this decision, determining that the Rule of Primogeniture did not apply and that succession would follow intestate principles. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the parties challenging the High Court's findings, affirming the lower courts' conclusions regarding the validity of the wills and the application of succession laws. The Court directed that the Trust could operate its charitable hospital until a specified date, after which management would be subject to further court orders.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Validity of Wills - Third Will declared null and void - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63 - The Trial Court found the Third Will to be a fabricated document due to suspicious circumstances, leading to intestate succession. Held that the claim of Rajkumari Amrit Kaur was accepted, granting her joint possession of the estate (Paras 14-14).

B) Succession Law - Rule of Primogeniture - Not applicable post-merger - Covenant of 1948 - The High Court held that the Rule of Primogeniture ceased to exist after the merger of Faridkot State with India, and succession would be governed by personal law (Paras 19-20).

C) Succession Law - Intestate Succession - Properties to be inherited by first-class heirs - The High Court concluded that succession to the properties left behind by the Ruler would be by intestate succession, recognizing the rights of Maharani Mohinder Kaur's heirs (Paras 22-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the succession to the properties left behind by Raja Harinder Singh was governed by the Rule of Primogeniture or the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, affirming the High Court's ruling that the Third Will was invalid and that succession would follow intestate principles, with specific directions regarding the Trust's operations.

Law Points

  • Succession law
  • validity of wills
  • Rule of Primogeniture
  • intestate succession
  • private property rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (09) 246

Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 9151-9153 of 2020

2022-09-07

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Mukul Rohatgi, Rakesh Dwivedi, Krishnan Venugopal, V. Giri

Maharani Deepinder Kaur, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, Bharat Inder Singh

Maharwal Khewaji Trust and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over succession to properties of deceased ruler.

Remedy Sought

Rajkumari Amrit Kaur sought declaration of ownership and joint possession.

Filing Reason

Claims regarding the validity of wills and rights to inheritance.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court declared the Third Will invalid and ruled in favor of Rajkumari Amrit Kaur.

Issues

Validity of the Third Will executed by Raja Harinder Singh Applicability of the Rule of Primogeniture in succession

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued the validity of the Third Will and the application of the Rule of Primogeniture. Respondents contended that the succession should follow intestate principles.

Ratio Decidendi

The Rule of Primogeniture ceased to apply post-merger of Faridkot State with India, and succession to private properties is governed by personal law, not by the Covenant or the Rule of Primogeniture.

Judgment Excerpts

The Third Will was a fabricated document which was shrouded with suspicious circumstances. The Rule of Primogeniture ceased to exist on account of Act of State. The succession to the properties left behind by the Ruler would be by intestate succession.

Procedural History

The matter progressed from the Trial Court to the High Court, where appeals were dismissed, leading to the filing of Special Leave Petitions in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 63
  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Remits for Fresh Consideration. The court found that the High Court incorrectly placed the burden of proof on the Corporation instead of the plaintiff regarding property ownership.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988...