Supreme Court Quashes High Court Orders on Land Acquisition Lapse Due to Misinterpretation of Legal Provisions. The court clarified that lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) requires both possession not taken and compensation not paid for five years.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dealt with multiple civil appeals concerning the lapse of land acquisition proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The appeals were filed by the Delhi Development Authority and the Government of NCT of Delhi against the High Court's decisions that declared the acquisition of land lapsed. The High Court had relied on Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, which stipulates conditions under which land acquisition proceedings can be deemed to have lapsed. The Supreme Court referenced the Constitution Bench ruling in Indore Development Authority v. Manohar Lal, which clarified that the lapse occurs only when both possession has not been taken and compensation has not been paid for five years or more prior to the 2013 Act's commencement. The court found that the High Court's judgments were contrary to this established legal principle. Consequently, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's orders and allowed the appeals, stating that the impugned judgments were unsustainable. No costs were awarded, and any pending applications were disposed of.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Lapse of Proceedings - Conditions for Lapse - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Section 24(2) - The court held that the lapse of land acquisition proceedings occurs only when both possession has not been taken and compensation has not been paid for five years or more prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. The court emphasized that if either condition is satisfied, there is no lapse. (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquisition of land has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's orders and allowed the appeals, stating that the impugned judgments were unsustainable. No costs were awarded.

Law Points

  • Land acquisition
  • lapse of proceedings
  • compensation
  • possession
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition
  • Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (09) 177

Civil Appeal Nos. 6885, 6886, 6887, 6888 of 2022

2022-09-26

M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari

Delhi Development Authority, Government of NCT of Delhi

Shiv Kumar and others, Ombir Singh Sethi and others, Vikas and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals concerning land acquisition proceedings

Remedy Sought

Quashing of High Court orders declaring land acquisition lapsed

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by High Court's declaration of lapse of acquisition

Previous Decisions

High Court had allowed writ petitions declaring acquisition lapsed

Issues

Whether the acquisition of land has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the High Court's decision was contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v. Manohar Lal. No arguments were presented on behalf of the original writ petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi

The lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act occurs only when both possession has not been taken and compensation has not been paid for five years or more prior to the commencement of the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court are unsustainable and the same deserve to be quashed and set aside. The lapse of land acquisition proceedings occurs only when both possession has not been taken and compensation has not been paid for five years or more prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the High Court's judgments dated 24.07.2017, 14.05.2018, and 10.10.2018, which declared the land acquisition lapsed.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act: 24(2)
  • Land Acquisition Act: 31(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry in Land Dispute. Unregistered Will and Lack of Notice to Legal Heirs Justified Setting Aside of Mutation Entry.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tahsildar's Orders for Vehicle Seizure and Demand of Royalty for Sand Transportation Beyond Permit Time. Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Violat...