Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Family Court Case for Convenience of Wife. Transfer of Original Suit Ordered from Etah to Mathura Based on Appellant's Financial and Emotional Circumstances.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the appellant-wife against the rejection of her transfer application by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appellant sought to transfer Original Suit No.23 of 2018, filed by her husband in Etah, to Mathura, citing difficulties in traveling and her financial dependence on her parents. The husband had filed the suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and the appellant had also initiated legal proceedings against him in Mathura. The High Court's rejection of her transfer plea prompted the appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court noted that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is paramount and should be considered when deciding on transfers. The court referred to a precedent which established that the socio-economic conditions of both parties must be taken into account. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, transferring the case from Etah to Mathura, and directed the lower court to send the case records promptly. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs, and any pending applications were disposed of.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Matrimonial Cases - Consideration of Wife's Convenience - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 24 - In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is a significant factor in deciding transfer applications. The court emphasized that the socio-economic conditions and emotional dependencies of the parties must be considered to ensure justice is served. Held that the transfer was justified based on the appellant's circumstances (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of Original Suit No.23 of 2018 from Etah to Mathura should be allowed based on the appellant's convenience.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed the transfer of Original Suit No.23 of 2018 from Etah to Mathura, with costs to be borne by the parties.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • convenience of parties
  • matrimonial matters
  • Section 24 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (08) 205

Civil Appeal No. 5218 of 2022

2022-08-05

S. Abdul Nazeer, J.K. Maheshwari

Kartikeya Bhargava, Vaibhav Mishra, Akansh Bansal, Parmanand Gaur

Ruchi Rawat

Principal Judge, Family Court Etah & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer application in matrimonial dispute

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Original Suit No.23 of 2018 from Etah to Mathura

Filing Reason

Appellant's difficulty in traveling and financial dependence

Previous Decisions

High Court rejected the transfer application

Issues

Transfer of case based on convenience Consideration of socio-economic factors in matrimonial disputes

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for transfer due to travel difficulties and financial dependence Respondent denied allegations and opposed transfer

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is a critical factor in deciding transfer applications, emphasizing the need to consider socio-economic conditions and emotional dependencies.

Judgment Excerpts

In matrimonial matters generally, it is wife’s convenience which must be looked at while considering the transfer. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that it is just and proper to transfer the case.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a transfer application in the High Court, which was rejected, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act: Section 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Packaged Commodities Under Legal Metrology Act. Court Holds That Alteration of MRP by Affixing Sticker and Non-Declaration of Manufacturer's Name on Wholesale Packages Are Not Violations U...