Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Extension of Tenure of NCLT Members — Upholds Statutory Provisions. The Court ruled that the Bar Association lacked locus standi to challenge the notification as the Members themselves did not raise any grievance.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Tribunal Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution against the Union of India, challenging a notification dated 20 September 2019 that appointed 28 Members to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for a tenure of three years. The petitioner contended that this tenure was contrary to Section 413 of the Companies Act, 2013, which stipulates a five-year term. The petitioner sought a modification of the tenure from three years to five years. The Union government raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition, arguing that the Members had accepted the three-year term and had not raised any grievance. The Selection Committee, chaired by the Chief Justice of India, had initiated a process for filling vacancies as the terms of some Members were expiring. The Court noted that while the three-year term was inconsistent with the Companies Act, the Members did not challenge it, and a selection process for new Members was already underway. The Court ultimately dismissed the petition, allowing the selection process to continue while directing that future appointments must comply with the statutory provisions of the Companies Act. The petition was disposed of without granting the requested extension of tenure.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Locus Standi - Challenge to Notification - Article 32 of the Constitution - The petitioner, a Bar Association, sought to challenge the notification appointing NCLT Members for three years instead of five, arguing it contravened Section 413 of the Companies Act 2013. The Court held that the Members themselves did not challenge the notification, and thus the Bar Association lacked locus standi to seek an extension of tenure (Paras 7, 25).

B) Administrative Law - Tenure of Office - Compliance with Statutory Provisions - Companies Act, 2013, Section 413 - The Court noted that the appointment of NCLT Members for three years was inconsistent with the statutory provision mandating a five-year term. However, it emphasized that the ongoing selection process for new Members should not be interfered with (Paras 25-28).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the National Company Law Tribunal Bar Association has the locus standi to challenge the notification regarding the tenure of NCLT Members.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court dismissed the petition, allowing the ongoing selection process for new Members to continue and directed that future appointments must comply with Section 413 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Law Points

  • Article 32
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
  • Section 413
  • locus standi
  • tenure of office
  • selection process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (08) 188

WP(C) 180 of 2022

2022-08-01

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Sudhanshu Dhulia

National Company Law Tribunal Bar Association

Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the notification regarding the tenure of NCLT Members.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the tenure of appointment of NCLT Members from three years to five years.

Filing Reason

The notification was allegedly contrary to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Issues

Whether the Bar Association has locus standi to challenge the notification. Whether the tenure of NCLT Members can be modified from three years to five years.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the three-year tenure was contrary to Section 413 of the Companies Act. The Union government contended that the Members accepted the three-year term and did not raise any grievance.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Bar Association lacked locus standi to challenge the notification as the Members themselves did not raise any grievance. It emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions for future appointments while allowing the selection process to continue.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ by this Court for the modification of the term of appointment of the 23 Members governed by the impugned notification. The appointment of persons as members of the NCLT for a period of three years is not contemplated by the provisions of Section 413(1). We are not acceding to the prayer of the petitioner for the extension of the tenures of all the 23 persons who were appointed on 20 September 2019 from three years to five years.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. Notice was issued on 5 April 2020. The matter was heard on 20 June 2022, and the Court considered issues of locus standi and the rights of appointees. The Union government filed an affidavit explaining its position, and a selection process for new Members was initiated.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 413
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Return of Plaint in Service Dispute — Jurisdiction Clause in Appointment Letter Held Binding. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Appointment Letter Ousts Nagpur Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 9 CPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Mining Activities in Meghalaya — Environmental Protection Measures Enforced.