Supreme Court Disposes of Petitions Related to Investigation and Protection Orders. The petitions were rendered infructuous as the majority of trials concluded, with directions for the ongoing trial to be completed in accordance with law.

  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed multiple petitions concerning the transfer of investigation and protection orders related to ongoing trials in Gujarat. The petitioner, Viraj Tra Desai, sought the transfer of investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation, which had been previously denied by the High Court. Concurrently, the National Human Rights Commission filed a writ petition regarding the same issues. The Supreme Court constituted a Special Investigating Team to oversee nine major trials in Gujarat. As of the latest developments, eight trials had concluded, with appeals pending, while one trial concerning the Naroda Gaam area was still ongoing, nearing final arguments. The court noted that the petitioners acknowledged that most matters had become infructuous, except for a request for protection for Ms. Teesta Setalvad. The court decided not to entertain the petitions further, directing that the Naroda Gaam trial be concluded according to law and allowing Ms. Setalvad to apply for protection to the relevant authorities. The petitions were thus disposed of as infructuous, with directions for the ongoing trial to reach a logical conclusion.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Investigation - Petition for transfer of investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation - Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7951 of 2002 - The High Court's negation of the transfer request led to the filing of the petition. The Supreme Court noted that the purpose of the petition had been served and the matters had become infructuous, thus disposing of the petitions. Held that the trial in the Naroda Gaam area should be concluded in accordance with law (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitions for transfer of investigation and protection orders should be entertained given the current status of trials.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court disposed of the petitions as infructuous, directing that the trial concerning Naroda Gaam be concluded in accordance with law and allowing Ms. Teesta Setalvad to apply for protection to the relevant authorities.

Law Points

  • Transfer of investigation
  • Special Investigating Team
  • protection orders
  • infructuous petitions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (08) 184

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7951 of 2002

2022-08-30

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, J.B. Pardiwala

Mukul Rohatgi, Aparna Bhat, Ejaz Maqbool, Amit Sharma

Viraj Tra Desai

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petitions concerning transfer of investigation and protection orders.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation and protection for Ms. Teesta Setalvad.

Filing Reason

Previous denial of transfer request by the High Court.

Previous Decisions

High Court negated the transfer request on 05.04.2002.

Issues

Whether the petitions should be entertained given the status of trials Whether protection for Ms. Teesta Setalvad should be granted

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for transfer of investigation and protection orders Respondents indicated that matters had become infructuous

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the petitions had become infructuous due to the conclusion of most trials and directed the ongoing trial to be completed as per law.

Judgment Excerpts

The matters are therefore disposed of as having become infructuous. The trial with respect to Naroda Gaam be taken to logical conclusion in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The High Court denied the transfer of investigation on 05.04.2002, leading to the filing of the Special Leave Petition. The Supreme Court constituted a Special Investigating Team for nine major trials, with ongoing developments leading to the current decision.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Req...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Case — Distinction Between Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Lands Emphasized.