Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition Due to Delay. Delay of 2323 Days Not Justified, Leading to Dismissal of Review Petition.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a Review Petition filed by Ram Gopal against the Joint Secretary Development and Panchayat Department. The petitioner sought to review a prior decision but faced a significant delay of 2323 days in filing the petition. The Supreme Court examined the application for condonation of this delay but found the explanation provided to be inadequate. Consequently, the court rejected the application for condonation of delay, which led to the dismissal of the Review Petition itself. The court's decision emphasized the importance of timely filing and the necessity for satisfactory explanations for delays in legal proceedings.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Condonation of Delay - Rejection of Application - Not applicable, 2020 - The court found the explanation for the delay of 2323 days unsatisfactory and rejected the application for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the Review Petition. Held that the delay was not justified (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the Review Petition could be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Review Petition was rejected due to the delay of 2323 days, as the explanation for the delay was deemed unsatisfactory.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Review petition rejection
  • Inherent jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (12) 265

Review Petition (Civil) D. No. 28176 of 2020

2021-12-14

Uday Umesh Lalit, L. Nageswara Rao, Vineet Saran

Ram Gopal

The Joint Secretary Development and Panchayat Department

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review Petition seeking to challenge a prior decision.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the Review Petition could be condoned.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner provided an explanation for the delay. The court found the explanation unsatisfactory.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of timely filing and the requirement for satisfactory explanations for delays in legal proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The explanation offered is far from being satisfactory. The application for condonation of delay is, therefore, rejected.

Procedural History

The Review Petition was filed after a significant delay of 2323 days, leading to the application for condonation of delay.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Essential Commodities Act Case — Proportionality of Confiscation Upheld. Appellate Court's Reduction of Confiscation from 100% to 15% of Seized Stock Found Not Perverse or Illegal Under Section 6B of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Murder Case Due to Inordinate Delay in High Court Appeal. Excessive Delay of Over Six Years in Disposing Appeal Held Sufficient Ground to Impose Lesser Sentence Under Section 302 of Indian...