Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Income Tax Matters — ITAT's Recall of Order Quashed. The ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction by recalling its earlier order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without merely rectifying a mistake apparent from the record.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (IT-4), Mumbai against the dismissal of writ petitions by the High Court of Bombay. The disputes arose from the ITAT's decision to recall its earlier order regarding tax liabilities of M/s Reliance Telecom Limited and M/s Reliance Communications Limited concerning payments made for software licensing. The Assessee had initially filed an application under Section 195(2) of the Income Tax Act, claiming that payments made to Ericsson A.B. were not taxable in India due to the absence of a permanent establishment and the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Assessing Officer rejected this application, leading to a series of appeals culminating in the ITAT's original order on 06.09.2013, which ruled in favor of the Revenue. The Assessee subsequently filed a miscellaneous application under Section 254(2) of the Act, which the ITAT granted, recalling its earlier order. The Revenue challenged this decision in the High Court, which dismissed the writ petitions. The Supreme Court found that the ITAT had exceeded its jurisdiction by re-evaluating the merits of the case rather than merely correcting a mistake. The court restored the original ITAT order and allowed the Assessee to appeal against it within six weeks without limitation objections. The appeals were allowed, and no costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Powers of ITAT - Recall of Orders - Section 254(2) Income Tax Act, 1961 - ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction by recalling its earlier order under Section 254(2) without merely rectifying a mistake apparent from the record. The court held that the ITAT's powers under Section 254(2) are limited to rectification and do not extend to re-hearing the entire appeal on merits (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the ITAT had the authority to recall its earlier order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court quashed the ITAT's order dated 18.11.2016 recalling its earlier order dated 06.09.2013 and restored the original orders passed by the ITAT. The Assessee was allowed to file appeals against the original order within six weeks without limitation objections.

Law Points

  • Income Tax Act
  • powers of ITAT
  • Section 254(2)
  • jurisdiction of ITAT
  • rectification of orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (12) 172

Civil Appeal No. 7110 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No. 7111 of 2021

2021-12-03

M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

Shri Balbir Singh, Shri Anuj Berry

Commissioner of Income Tax (IT-4), Mumbai

M/s Reliance Telecom Limited, M/s Reliance Communications Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of writ petitions concerning tax liabilities.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the original ITAT order and quashing of the ITAT's recall order.

Filing Reason

The Revenue challenged the ITAT's authority to recall its earlier order.

Previous Decisions

The ITAT had previously ruled in favor of the Revenue on 06.09.2013.

Issues

Whether the ITAT had the authority to recall its earlier order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The Revenue argued that the ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in recalling the order. The Assessee contended that the ITAT had the authority to revisit its earlier decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The ITAT's powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act are limited to rectifying mistakes apparent from the record and do not extend to re-evaluating the merits of a case.

Judgment Excerpts

The powers under Section 254(2) of the Act are only to rectify/correct any mistake apparent from the record. The order passed by the ITAT recalling its earlier order dated 06.09.2013 is unsustainable.

Procedural History

The Revenue filed writ petitions against the ITAT's order recalling its earlier decision. The High Court dismissed these petitions, leading to the present appeals before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 254(2), Section 195(2), Section 9(1)(vi)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XLVII Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Award of Arbitrator in Labour Dispute — No Errors Found. Sufficient provisions for workers' claims recognized.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding DNA Test in Succession Certificate Proceedings — Clarifies Legal Standards for DNA Testing. Citing the presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Evidence Act, the court emphasized that DNA tests sho...