Supreme Court Disposes Transfer Petition Following Withdrawal Request. Court allowed the respondent's request to withdraw the Hindu Marriage Petition, rendering the transfer petition moot. The court held that the petitioner could seek revival if the withdrawal was not granted.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by Prachi Jain against Shreyansh Jain in the Supreme Court of India. The respondent, Shreyansh Jain, sought permission to withdraw his Hindu Marriage Petition (H.M.A. No. 2553 of 2019), which was the subject of the transfer petition. The learned Senior Advocate for the respondent indicated that due to a stay granted by the Supreme Court, the respondent was unable to approach the Family Court for withdrawal. The court noted that if the withdrawal was permitted, the transfer petition would become irrelevant. The court took the respondent's statement on record regarding his desire to withdraw the petition and disposed of the transfer petition accordingly. It also stated that should the respondent attempt to proceed with the petition without formal withdrawal or if the Family Court disallowed the withdrawal, the petitioner could seek revival of the transfer petition. The judgment was delivered by Justice Abhay S. Oka on December 3, 2021.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Withdrawal of Petition - Permission to Withdraw - Hindu Marriage Petition - Respondent sought permission to withdraw his petition, which if allowed, would render the transfer petition moot. The court disposed of the transfer petition based on the respondent's statement of intent to withdraw, allowing for revival if the withdrawal is not granted by the Family Court. Held that the transfer petition is disposed of in light of the withdrawal request (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent can withdraw the Hindu Marriage Petition and what implications it has on the transfer petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court disposed of the transfer petition based on the respondent's request to withdraw his Hindu Marriage Petition, allowing for revival if necessary.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petition
  • Transfer of cases
  • Family law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (12) 142

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No.195/2020

2021-12-03

Abhay S. Oka

Prachi Jain

Shreyansh Jain

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition concerning a Hindu Marriage Petition.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought permission to withdraw his Hindu Marriage Petition.

Filing Reason

The respondent filed for withdrawal due to a stay granted by the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether the respondent can withdraw the Hindu Marriage Petition Implications of withdrawal on the transfer petition

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent's counsel argued for permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner can seek revival if the withdrawal is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that allowing the withdrawal of the petition would render the transfer petition moot, and the petitioner retains the right to seek revival if the withdrawal is not granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent is seeking a permission to withdraw Hindu Marriage Petition bearing H.M.A. No. 2553 of 2019. If the prayer for withdrawal of the petition filed by the respondent is allowed, nothing will survive in this petition.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a Hindu Marriage Petition, followed by a transfer petition by the petitioner, and subsequently sought permission to withdraw the original petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Agricultural Land Dispute — Settlement Reached Among Parties. The court upheld the High Court's ruling that mortgagees cannot claim tenant rights under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Search Warrant Issued Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act — No Requirement to Record Grounds for Belief.