Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Recall of FIR Quashing Order. High Court Lacked Authority to Recall Its Order Quashing FIR Under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against a High Court order that recalled its previous judgment quashing an FIR. The appellant challenged the recall of the order dated 20.04.2021, which had quashed the FIR based on a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The High Court initially allowed the petition but later, on 28.04.2021, took up the matter suo moto and recalled its earlier order. The core legal issue was whether the High Court had the power to recall its order under Section 362 of the Cr.P.C., which only permits correction of clerical or arithmetical errors. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the arguments and the legal provisions, concluded that the High Court's action was beyond its authority as it could not alter a judgment once passed, except for clerical corrections. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and reinstated the earlier order quashing the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Recall of Orders - High Court's Power - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 362 - The High Court lacked the authority to recall its earlier order quashing the FIR as per Section 362, which only allows for correction of clerical or arithmetical errors. The court held that the recall of the order was not permissible, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court had the power to recall its order quashing the FIR.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order dated 28.04.2021, and reinstated the order dated 20.04.2021 quashing the FIR.

Law Points

  • Section 362 Cr.P.C.
  • recall of orders
  • power of High Court
  • quashing of FIR
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 177

Criminal Appeal No. 1444/2021

2021-11-22

Vineet Saran, Aniruddha Bose

Rajit, Vaibhav Niti, Abraham Mathan, Justine George, Madhavi Agrawal, Divyanshu Agrawal, G. Prakash, Priyanka Prakash, Beena Prakash, Anand Kalyanakrishnan, Vedant Singh, Vishisht Singh

XXX

The State of Kerala & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the recall of an order quashing an FIR.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to reinstate the order quashing the FIR.

Filing Reason

The High Court recalled its earlier order without jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had initially quashed the FIR on 20.04.2021.

Issues

Whether the High Court had the power to recall its order quashing the FIR.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the recall was beyond the High Court's authority under Section 362. The respondents did not dispute the lack of power to recall the order.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court cannot recall its orders once passed, except for clerical or arithmetical corrections as per Section 362 of the Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

The Court does not have the power to alter the judgment and order once passed, except to correct the clerical or arithmetical error. The impugned order dated 28.04.2021 could not have been passed.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR, which was allowed by the High Court on 20.04.2021. The High Court later recalled this order suo moto on 28.04.2021, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 362
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Impounding of Agreements to Sell Under Maharashtra Stamp Act — Agreements Not Part of Single Transaction, Possession Transferred, Deemed Conveyance Under Explanation I to Article 25 of Schedule I.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Dacoity and Murder Case — Key Evidence from Witness Testimonies.