Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition to Ghazipur Due to Jurisdictional Convenience. Transfer of proceedings justified under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for expeditious resolution.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife, Jyoti Jaiswal, under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petition sought the transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017, which was filed by the respondent-husband, Neeraj Kumar Gupta, in the Court of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan, to a competent court in Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh. The court heard arguments from both sides and reviewed the records. It concluded that the circumstances justified the transfer of the proceedings to facilitate a more convenient and timely resolution of the divorce case. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the divorce petition to Ghazipur and directed the Additional District and Sessions Court in Rajasthan to send the entire case record to the transferee court immediately. The transferee court was instructed to expedite the decision on the case. The order was to be communicated to both courts via email for compliance. The transfer petition was allowed in the terms stated.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Justification for Transfer - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner-wife sought transfer of a divorce petition filed by the husband from Rajasthan to Ghazipur, UP. The court found the request justified based on the facts and circumstances presented, allowing the transfer for convenience and expeditious resolution of the case. Held that the transfer was warranted (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 from Rajasthan to Ghazipur is justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 from the Court of Ld. Additional District & Sessions Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan to the competent Court at Ghazipur, UP. The court directed the immediate transmission of the case record and instructed the transferee court to expedite the decision.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • Divorce petition
  • Jurisdiction
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 147

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 113 of 2018

2021-11-22

B.V. Nagarathna

Jyoti Jaiswal

Neeraj Kumar Gupta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for divorce proceedings

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce petition to Ghazipur

Filing Reason

Convenience and expeditious resolution

Issues

Justification for transfer of divorce petition Jurisdictional convenience

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought transfer for convenience Respondent's opposition not mentioned

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of convenience and timely resolution in family law matters, allowing the transfer of proceedings under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Judgment Excerpts

This transfer petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 Consequently, the Divorce Petition No.10/2017... is transferred to the Court of competent jurisdiction, if any, at Ghazipur, U.P.

Procedural History

Transfer petition filed, heard by the Supreme Court, order issued for transfer.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Without Back Wages Upheld. Court declines to interfere with concurrent findings that denial of back wages was justified due to pe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Nature of Expenditure in Income Tax Case — Revenue Expenditure Affirmed.