Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Case for Convenience. Transfer of Divorce Case Granted Due to Distance and Inconvenience for the Petitioner Under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife, Mamta, under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the transfer of her divorce case from Sirohi, Rajasthan to Gandhinagar, Gujarat. The divorce case, titled 'Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal Vs. Smt. Mamta', was pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, No. 1, Aburoad, Sirohi, Rajasthan. The petitioner argued that the distance of approximately 237 km made it impractical for her to travel to Sirohi for court proceedings. Despite notice being served to the respondent, Kailash Chand Agrawal, there was no representation on his behalf. The court, after considering the facts and hearing the petitioner's counsel, determined that transferring the case was just and appropriate given the circumstances. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the divorce case to the Court of the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, allowing the petition in the terms sought.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Divorce Case - Convenience of Parties - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner sought transfer of a divorce case from Sirohi to Gandhinagar due to the distance and difficulty in attending court. The court found it just and appropriate to allow the transfer for the convenience of the petitioner. Held that the transfer was warranted under the circumstances (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce case should be transferred from Sirohi, Rajasthan to Gandhinagar, Gujarat for the convenience of the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018 from Sirohi, Rajasthan to Gandhinagar, Gujarat, citing the convenience of the petitioner as the primary reason.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • convenience of parties
  • jurisdictional issues
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 117

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2460 of 2019

2021-11-22

B.V. Nagarathna

Mamta

Kailash Chand Agrawal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for divorce case

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce case to Gandhinagar, Gujarat

Filing Reason

Inconvenience due to distance for attending court

Issues

Transfer of divorce case for convenience Jurisdictional considerations in family law

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that travel to Sirohi is impractical due to distance. Respondent did not represent in court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of convenience for parties in family law matters, allowing for the transfer of cases to ensure fair access to justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. I find that it is just and appropriate to transfer the Divorce Case No. 94 of 2018.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Notice was issued to the respondent, who did not appear. The court heard the petitioner's counsel and decided to transfer the case.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Appointment of Arbitrator Under Arbitration Act, 1940 — Limitation Issue Resolved.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Rights in Central Excise Department — Clarifies Applicability of 1979 Rules. The court confirmed that employees had a legal right to promotion under the 1979 Rules for vacancies arising prior to the new rules.