Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Over Railway Contract. The court found that the previous arbitrator's ex parte award violated principles of natural justice and public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a contract awarded to M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons by the Divisional Superintendent Engineer-II, Northern Railway, for additional washing lines at Jammu Tawi Railway Station. Following the termination of the contract in 1996 due to alleged non-performance, the appellant invoked the arbitration clause. The appointed arbitrator issued an ex parte award in favor of the appellant, which was later challenged by the respondent under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Additional District Judge dismissed the objections, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the award, citing violations of natural justice and the arbitrator's haste. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, agreed with the High Court's findings and noted that the respondent was not given a fair opportunity to present its case, leading to the conclusion that the award was in conflict with public policy. The court appointed a new arbitrator, Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal, to adjudicate the disputes, directing both parties to share the arbitration costs and ensuring that the proceedings would continue from the stage where the respondent could cross-examine the appellant's witness. The question of interest was left open for the new arbitrator to decide. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Ex Parte Award - Setting Aside - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34 - The court found that the arbitrator's ex parte award violated principles of natural justice as the respondent was deprived of a fair opportunity to present its case. The award was set aside on grounds of the respondent being unable to present its case and conflict with public policy. Held that the arbitration proceedings would continue with a newly appointed arbitrator (Paras 5-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the ex parte award should be set aside due to violation of natural justice and public policy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the ex parte award and appointed Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal as the new arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, directing both parties to share the arbitration costs and allowing the respondent to cross-examine the appellant's witness.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • natural justice
  • ex parte award
  • public policy
  • appointment of arbitrator
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 106

Civil Appeal No. 6734 of 2021

2021-11-18

Sanjiv Khanna, M.R. Shah

Ashish Verma, Sanjay Jain

M/S. Narinder Singh and Sons

Union of India through Divisional Superintendent Engineer – II, Northern Railway, Ferozepur Division, Ferozepur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over arbitration award related to a railway contract.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought enforcement of the arbitration award.

Filing Reason

Respondent challenged the ex parte arbitration award.

Previous Decisions

The High Court set aside the arbitrator's award citing violations of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the ex parte award should be set aside due to violation of natural justice Whether a new arbitrator should be appointed for adjudication

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for enforcement of the arbitration award Respondent contended that the award violated principles of natural justice

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the ex parte award was set aside due to violations of natural justice and public policy, emphasizing the need for fair opportunity in arbitration proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The award was also 'in conflict with the public policy of India' under clause (ii) to Section 34(2)(b) We hereby appoint Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal, a retired Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, as the arbitrator to adjudicate and decide the said disputes.

Procedural History

The appellant was awarded a contract in 1993, disputes arose leading to arbitration in 2006, an ex parte award was issued in 2010, objections were filed and dismissed in 2012, the High Court set aside the award in 2017, and the Supreme Court appointed a new arbitrator in 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: 34, 18, 19
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Life Convict Despite No Relative, Interpreting 'Relative' Broadly Under Goa Prison Rules. The court directed reconsideration of furlough application treating a non-relative as 'relative' under Rule 316(3) of Goa ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Challenge to Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit — No Right to Challenge Without Being Party to Compromise. Petitioners, who were not parties to the compromise in Regular Civil Suit No.730/2017, cannot challen...