Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Cancellation of Licences for Group Housing Development. The First Come First Serve Policy for Granting Licences Held Unfair and Not Transparent Under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the cancellation of licences granted to certain developers for group housing projects in Gurgaon, Haryana. The appellants, Anant Raj Ltd. and others, challenged the High Court's decision which deemed the First Come First Serve policy for granting licences as unfair and not transparent. The High Court's judgment was based on the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, which did not support such a policy. The original petitioners, who were denied licences, argued that the process was arbitrary and sought a fairer method. The appellants contended that their applications were in accordance with the guidelines and that the policy had been a long-standing practice. The Supreme Court analyzed the legality of the First Come First Serve principle, emphasizing that it lacked a statutory basis and was inconsistent with the principles of fairness and transparency required under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court found that the policy led to an unholy race among applicants and was not in the public interest. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to cancel the licences and directed the State to formulate a new, transparent policy for granting licences. The appeals were dismissed, and the Court noted that all pending applications would be considered under the new policy established in 2017.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Licensing Policy - Fairness and Transparency - Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 - The High Court held that the First Come First Serve policy for granting licences was not fair or transparent, leading to its cancellation and a directive for a new policy. Held that the existing policy violated public interest and Article 14 (Paras 3, 18, 40).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the methodology adopted by the State of Haryana for grant of licence on a First Come First Serve basis is just, proper, and legally tenable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the High Court's decision to cancel the licences and directed the State to formulate a new policy for granting licences.

Law Points

  • First Come First Serve principle
  • fair and transparent policy
  • public interest
  • Article 14 of the Constitution
  • Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act
  • 1975
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 234

Civil Appeal No(s). 6471 of 2021

2021-10-27

Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S. Oka

Ranjit Kumar, Anil Grover

Anant Raj Ltd.

State of Haryana & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the cancellation of licences for group housing development.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of cancelled licences and a declaration of the First Come First Serve policy as valid.

Filing Reason

Cancellation of licences by the High Court deemed unfair and arbitrary.

Previous Decisions

High Court ruled against the First Come First Serve policy, leading to the cancellation of licences.

Issues

Legality of First Come First Serve policy Fairness and transparency in licensing process

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that their applications were valid and in accordance with existing policies. The respondents contended that the First Come First Serve policy was arbitrary and not in public interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The First Come First Serve policy for granting licences was found to be arbitrary and not in compliance with the principles of fairness and transparency mandated by Article 14 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The policy adopted by the State authorities for the grant of licence on the principle of First Come First Serve basis cannot be held to be fair, reasonable and transparent method. The principle of First Come First Serve basis which has been adopted by the State Respondents in the facts of the instant case is neither held to be rational nor in public interest.

Procedural History

The High Court cancelled the licences granted to the appellants, leading to appeals before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975: Section 3, Section 9A
  • Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. The court ruled that the limitation period for filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 commences from the date of receipt of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Decision on Zamindari Land Rights Due to Misinterpretation of Khudkasht Definition. The court clarified that only land personally cultivated and recorded as Khudkasht before the vesting date is exempt from vesting...