Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition for Convenience. Transfer Granted to Facilitate Effective Defense of Petitioner Residing in Gwalior Under Section 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife, Babita Srivastava, under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to transfer a divorce petition filed by the respondent-husband, Vinod Srivastava, from the Court of Principal District Judge Family Court at Gurugram, Haryana, to a court of competent jurisdiction at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner argued that she resided in Gwalior and thus requested the transfer for convenience. The respondent's counsel stated that there was no objection to the transfer. The Supreme Court, considering the considerable distance between Gurugram and Gwalior and the difficulties faced by the petitioner, decided to allow the transfer to facilitate the petitioner's effective defense. The court emphasized the need for both parties to cooperate with the Gwalior court for the expeditious disposal of the case. The petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Petition - Jurisdiction and Convenience - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner sought transfer of a divorce petition to Gwalior due to residing there, and the respondent raised no objection. The court considered the distance and the petitioner's ability to defend effectively, directing the transfer to Gwalior for expeditious disposal. Held that the transfer was justified for convenience (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Gurugram to Gwalior for the convenience of the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of the divorce petition from Gurugram to Gwalior, directing that it be transferred to a competent court at Gwalior for expeditious disposal.

Law Points

  • Transfer of petition
  • jurisdiction
  • convenience of parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 210

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No. 1867/2019

2021-10-25

B.V. Nagarathna

Babita Srivastava

Vinod Srivastava

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for divorce proceedings

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce petition to Gwalior

Filing Reason

Petitioner resides in Gwalior and seeks convenience

Issues

Transfer of divorce petition Jurisdiction for convenience

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner resides in Gwalior and seeks transfer for convenience Respondent raised no objection to the transfer

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of convenience for the petitioner in legal proceedings, allowing the transfer of the divorce petition to facilitate effective defense.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms. In order to enable the petitioner to effectively defend the aforesaid petition, the aforesaid petition namely HMA No. 560/2018 is directed to be transferred.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a transfer petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of a divorce petition from Gurugram to Gwalior.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Promotion Regulations in Administrative Service — Clarifies Interpretation of Selection Committee Procedures.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated by medical evidence.