Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Award in Compassionate Appointment Case Due to Delay Attributed to Appellants. Delay in Processing Application for Compassionate Appointment Resulted in Denial of Fair Consideration Under the 1998 Scheme.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Telecommunication, BSNL against a judgment by the Allahabad High Court that granted Rs.10 lakhs to the respondent for the denial of compassionate appointment after the death of his father, a Telephone Mechanic. The father passed away on 07.02.2003, and the respondent applied for compassionate appointment on 15.10.2004, completing all necessary formalities by 03.07.2005 under the 1998 Scheme. The appellants introduced a new Scheme on 27.06.2007, which led to the rejection of the respondent's application on 15.09.2007, citing that the family was not indigent. The respondent challenged this rejection, arguing that the delay in processing his application was due to the appellants' inaction. The High Court acknowledged the respondent's right to fair consideration but noted that he had crossed the age of 50 by the time the matter reached them, making employment impossible. However, they awarded him Rs.10 lakhs as compensation. The Supreme Court found that the delay was indeed attributable to the appellants and modified the compensation to Rs.5 lakhs, directing payment within four weeks, failing which interest would accrue. The court emphasized the importance of timely processing applications for compassionate appointments and recognized the respondent's entitlement under the 1998 Scheme.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Compassionate Appointment - Delay in Processing Application - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The respondent's application for compassionate appointment was delayed due to inaction by the appellants, leading to a denial of his right to fair consideration. The court modified the High Court's order, awarding Rs.5 lakhs as compensation for the delay caused by the appellants (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent was entitled to compassionate appointment and the appropriate compensation due to delay in processing his application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's judgment, reducing the compensation from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs.5 lakhs, to be paid within four weeks, with interest at 9% per annum if delayed.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Delay in processing applications
  • Right to fair consideration
  • Compensation for loss of opportunity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (09) 258

Civil Appeal No. 6019 of 2021

2021-09-28

AJAY RASTOGI, ABHAY S OKA

THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMMUNICATION, BSNL & ORS.

VIDYA PRASAD

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's order granting compensation for denial of compassionate appointment.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the High Court's compensation award.

Filing Reason

Denial of compassionate appointment due to delay in processing the application.

Previous Decisions

High Court awarded Rs.10 lakhs as compensation for the delay.

Issues

Entitlement to compassionate appointment Compensation for delay in processing application

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the respondent was not indigent and thus not eligible for compassionate appointment. The respondent contended that the delay in processing his application was solely due to the appellants' inaction.

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in processing applications for compassionate appointments can lead to a denial of justice, warranting compensation for the affected party.

Judgment Excerpts

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.12.2017 The delay was admittedly attributable to the appellants The payment of Rs.5 lakhs shall be made over to the respondent within a period of four weeks from today

Procedural History

The respondent's application for compassionate appointment was rejected by the appellants, leading to a challenge in the Tribunal and subsequently in the High Court, which granted compensation. The appellants appealed to the Supreme Court against this decision.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second PIL on Same Subject Matter as Abuse of Process. Successive PILs through different organizations but same advocate on identical issues held not maintainable and dismissed with costs.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Back Wages Due to Non-Employment. Legal Heirs Entitled to 50% of Back Wages as Deceased Did Not Work During Relevant Period.