Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 Due to Irretrievable Breakdown. Court Found Marriage Emotionally Dead and Ordered Settlement Payment.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a marriage between the appellant and respondent, which was registered under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, on 02.03.1997 and solemnized on 07.12.2000. The appellant filed for dissolution of marriage on 05.03.2007, alleging cruelty and desertion, which was dismissed by the Trial Court and upheld by the High Court of Calcutta. The appellant claimed that the respondent insisted on living separately from his parents and misbehaved with in-laws, while the respondent countered with allegations of adultery and excessive alcohol consumption against the appellant. The appellant's counsel argued that the couple had been living separately for over 16 years, asserting that the marriage was effectively over. The court appointed an Amicus Curiae to represent the respondent, who indicated that she wished to continue the marriage despite the circumstances. The court referenced previous judgments where marriages were dissolved due to irretrievable breakdown and noted the lack of meaningful reconciliation efforts from the respondent. Ultimately, the court determined that the marriage was emotionally dead and dissolved it under Article 142, ordering the appellant to pay Rs. 25 Lakhs to the respondent as a final settlement, which would also lead to the withdrawal of the respondent's maintenance petition. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Dissolution of Marriage - Irretrievable Breakdown - Article 142 Constitution of India - The court found that the marriage was emotionally dead and no purpose would be served by compelling the parties to live together. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage, directing the appellant to pay a settlement amount to the respondent (Paras 6-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the marriage between the parties should be dissolved under Article 142 of the Constitution of India due to irretrievable breakdown.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, ordering the appellant to pay Rs. 25 Lakhs to the respondent within eight weeks, which would settle all claims and lead to the withdrawal of the respondent's maintenance petition.

Law Points

  • Dissolution of marriage
  • Irretrievable breakdown
  • Article 142 Constitution of India
  • Cruelty
  • Desertion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (09) 212

Civil Appeal No. 5696 of 2021 (@ SLP (C) No.11747 of 2017)

2021-09-14

L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai

Nikhil Nayyar, Ranjan Mukherjee

Subhransu Sarkar

Indrani Sarkar (nee Das)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dissolution of marriage

Remedy Sought

Dissolution of marriage and settlement payment

Filing Reason

Allegations of cruelty and desertion

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the suit; High Court upheld the dismissal

Issues

Whether the marriage should be dissolved under Article 142 Whether the allegations of cruelty and desertion were substantiated

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for dissolution due to long separation and irretrievable breakdown Respondent expressed intent to continue the marriage despite allegations

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the marriage was emotionally dead and that compelling the parties to continue living together would serve no useful purpose, thus justifying the dissolution under Article 142.

Judgment Excerpts

The marriage between the parties is emotionally dead and there is no point in persuading them to live together any more. The payment of the aforesaid amount is in full and final settlement of all claims of the Respondent against the Appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit for dissolution of marriage on 05.03.2007, which was dismissed by the Trial Court. The appellant's appeal to the High Court was also dismissed, leading to the current appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Special Marriage Act, 1954:
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Termination of Probationary Employees as Retrenchment Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions. Termination of Service of Probationers Constitutes Retrenchment Under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disput...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Employment Termination Case — Legal Defect in Writ Proceedings Identified. The absence of the State of Maharashtra as a necessary party in the writ proceedings rendered the High Court's orders unsustainable.