Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Change of Date of Birth in Service Records — Upholds Statutory Provisions. The court ruled that the request for change of date of birth made after a significant delay was not maintainable under the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the request of an employee for a change of date of birth in his service records from 04.01.1960 to 24.01.1961, which was initially recorded based on his SSLC Marks Card. The employee, after 24 years of service, filed a suit for declaration of his date of birth, which was dismissed by the Trial Court based on the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974, which mandates that such requests must be made within three years of joining or one year from the commencement of the Act. The employee appealed to the High Court, which allowed the appeal and decreed the suit, leading the corporation to file the present appeals. The corporation argued that the High Court erred in allowing the appeal due to the significant delay and the employee's ignorance of the law. The employee contended that the High Court's decision had been implemented and that the appeal had become infructuous. The court analyzed the statutory provisions and previous judgments regarding the correction of date of birth, emphasizing that applications made after a long delay are not sustainable. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeals, affirming the need for timely applications under the Act and ruling in favor of the corporation while noting that the employee's retirement would not be affected by the judgment.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Change of Date of Birth - Delay and Laches - Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974, Sections 4, 5 - The court held that an application for change of date of birth made after a delay of 24 years is not maintainable, as it contravenes the statutory provisions requiring timely applications. The High Court's decision to allow the change was deemed unsustainable due to the significant delay and lack of adherence to the Act's requirements (Paras 11-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the request for change of date of birth made after a significant delay is maintainable under the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed both Civil Appeal No.5720 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.5721 of 2021, ruling that the request for change of date of birth was not maintainable due to delay and laches, affirming the statutory provisions of the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974.

Law Points

  • Change of date of birth
  • delay and laches
  • jurisdiction of courts
  • Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act
  • 1974
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (09) 183

Civil Appeal No.5720 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.5721 of 2021

2021-09-21

M. R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna

Gurudas S. Kannur, Ashok Bannidinni

Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited

T.P. Nataraja & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding change of date of birth in service records

Remedy Sought

Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited sought to overturn the High Court's decision allowing the change of date of birth.

Filing Reason

The original plaintiff requested a change of date of birth after a significant delay.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court dismissed the suit based on statutory provisions; the High Court allowed the appeal, leading to the present appeals.

Issues

Whether the request for change of date of birth made after a significant delay is maintainable under the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the High Court erred in allowing the change due to the significant delay and ignorance of the law. The respondent contended that the High Court's decision had been implemented and the appeal was infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that applications for change of date of birth must be made within the time limits prescribed by the Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974, and that significant delays render such applications unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that an application for change of date of birth made after a delay of 24 years is not maintainable. Ignorance of law cannot be an excuse to get out of the applicability of the statutory provisions.

Procedural History

The original plaintiff filed a suit which was dismissed by the Trial Court. The plaintiff appealed to the High Court, which allowed the appeal and decreed the suit. The corporation then filed the present appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974: Sections 4, 5, 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff's Right to Specific Performance in Land Sale Dispute — Agreement Valid Despite Co-Ownership Issues.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Against Section 7A EPF Order, Holds Remedy of Appeal Under Section 7-I Not Barred by Rejection of Review Under Section 7B. The court interpreted Section 7B(5) of the Employees' Provident Funds and ...