Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in IPC Section 307 Case — Sentence Reduced. The court recognized the amicable settlement between the parties and reduced the sentence from ten years to five years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 307 IPC.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the appellant against the conviction upheld by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay for an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, resulting in a ten-year sentence. The prosecution's case stemmed from an incident on 11th May 2016, where the appellant, along with associates, allegedly stabbed the complainant's uncle, Chintaman Dange, during a public procession. Following the trial, the appellant was convicted and sentenced by the trial court on 23rd February 2018. The appellant's appeal to the High Court was dismissed on 4th January 2019, prompting the current appeal. The Supreme Court noted that both lower courts' findings were concurrent and without fault. However, the appellant sought a reduction of sentence, which was supported by a joint affidavit from the appellant's wife and the victim, indicating a peaceful resolution of their disputes. The court acknowledged the amicable settlement and the victim's acceptance of the appellant's apology, referencing previous judgments that allowed for sentence reductions in non-compoundable offences under similar circumstances. Ultimately, the Supreme Court decided to reduce the appellant's sentence to five years of rigorous imprisonment while upholding the conviction under Section 307 IPC, reflecting a sympathetic view based on the parties' reconciliation and the nature of the incident.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Reduction of Sentence - Amicable Settlement - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court considered the mutual settlement between the parties and the acceptance of the appellant's apology by the victim, leading to a decision to reduce the sentence from ten years to five years of rigorous imprisonment. The court emphasized the absence of coercion in the settlement and the peaceful coexistence of the parties post-incident. Held that the circumstances warranted a sympathetic view towards the appellant (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the sentence imposed under Section 307 IPC should be reduced based on subsequent amicable settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but reduced the sentence to five years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000, with a default of three months' rigorous imprisonment.

Law Points

  • Reduction of sentence
  • amicable settlement
  • non-compoundable offences
  • Section 307 IPC
  • judicial discretion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (09) 176

Criminal Appeal No. 988 of 2021

2021-09-13

Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S. Oka

Sy. Azhar Sy. Kalandar

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Section 307 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Reduction of sentence by the appellant.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the High Court's upholding of conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

Conviction upheld by the trial court and the High Court.

Issues

Whether the sentence should be reduced based on an amicable settlement. Whether the circumstances warrant a sympathetic view.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel argued for a reduction of sentence based on the amicable settlement. The victim's counsel supported the reduction, citing the acceptance of the apology.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence in light of the amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and the absence of coercion.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has not been able to mount an effective challenge founded upon a question of law. The joint affidavit placed on record makes it clear that the parties, on the advice of their elders, entered into an amicable settlement. This Court has taken note of the compromise between the parties to reduce the sentence of the convicts even in serious non-compoundable offences.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the trial court on 23rd February 2018, the conviction was upheld by the High Court on 4th January 2019, and the appeal was filed in the Supreme Court thereafter.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 307
  • Code of Criminal Procedure: 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Partial Relief to Judicial Service Candidates in Reservation Dispute. The court found that the Rajasthan Public Service Commission improperly applied reservation principles, leading to excess selection of women candidates contrar...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Finding on Detention Period Under Preventive Detention Act — Clarifies Legal Interpretation of Detention Authority's Powers.