Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate on Deferred Salaries and Pensions Amid COVID-19 Financial Crisis. The court upheld the High Court's ruling on the entitlement of salaries and pensions while reducing the interest rate on deferred payments.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arose from a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court concerning the deferment of salaries and pensions by the State Government due to the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The State issued Government Orders (GOMs) No. 26 and No. 37 in March and April 2020, respectively, to defer payments to various categories of employees and pensioners. A writ petition was filed by a former District and Sessions Judge, asserting that salaries and pensions are a matter of right and should not be deferred. The High Court ruled in favor of the petition, stating that the deferment was unlawful and directed the State to pay the deferred amounts along with interest at 12% per annum. The State appealed to the Supreme Court, challenging only the interest component. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's findings regarding the entitlement to salaries and pensions, emphasizing that these payments are essential to the right to life and property. However, the Court modified the interest rate from 12% to 6% per annum, acknowledging the State's financial difficulties while ensuring timely payment to employees and pensioners. The Court directed the State to pay the modified interest within thirty days, specifically for certain categories of employees as per the original GOMs. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life and Property - Payment of Salaries and Pensions - Article 21 and Article 300A of the Constitution - The court held that salaries and pensions are intrinsic to the right to life and property, and cannot be deferred without legal backing. The High Court's direction for payment of deferred salaries and pensions was upheld, emphasizing the entitlement of employees and pensioners (Paras 8-9).

B) Administrative Law - Deferment of Payments - Government Orders and Legal Authority - The court found that the State could not defer salaries and pensions through a government order without following legal procedures. The High Court's ruling was affirmed, directing payment of dues with interest (Paras 8-9).

C) Interest on Deferred Payments - Modification of Interest Rate - The court modified the interest rate from 12% to 6% per annum on deferred salaries and pensions, recognizing the financial constraints faced by the State due to the pandemic while ensuring that employees and pensioners receive their rightful dues (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government was liable to pay interest on deferred salaries and pensions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the interest rate on deferred salaries and pensions from 12% to 6% per annum, directing the State to pay within thirty days, specifically for categories 3, 4, 5, and 6 of GOMs No 26 dated 31 March 2020.

Law Points

  • deferment of salaries
  • pensions
  • right to life
  • right to property
  • interest on delayed payments
  • administrative orders
  • public interest litigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (02) 273

Civil Appeal No 399 of 2021

2021-02-08

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, M R Shah

Mr Shekhar Naphade, Mr Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Mr Yelamanchili Shiva Santosh Kumar

The State of Andhra Pradesh and Another

Smt Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the deferment of salaries and pensions by the State Government.

Remedy Sought

Payment of outstanding salaries and pensions with interest.

Filing Reason

Deferment of salaries and pensions due to COVID-19 financial crisis.

Previous Decisions

High Court ruled that deferment was unlawful and directed payment of dues.

Issues

Liability to pay interest on deferred salaries and pensions Legality of deferment of payments by government order

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that deferment was necessary due to financial crisis Respondents contended that deferment was unlawful and caused hardship

Ratio Decidendi

Salaries and pensions are fundamental rights under Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution, and cannot be deferred without legal authority. The court recognized the need for timely payment while adjusting the interest rate to reflect the State's financial constraints.

Judgment Excerpts

The States’ own revenue consisting of tax revenue and non-tax revenue have shown a precipitous decline of 52% Pension is payable to the retired employees for the past services rendered by them to the State. The court found that the State could not defer salaries and pensions through a government order without following legal procedures.

Procedural History

The High Court issued a judgment on 11 August 2020, which was appealed by the State Government under Article 136 of the Constitution, challenging the interest component of the High Court's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Disaster Management Act, 2005: Section 23
  • Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules: Rule 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. The court ruled that the limitation period for filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 commences from the date of receipt of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Decision on Zamindari Land Rights Due to Misinterpretation of Khudkasht Definition. The court clarified that only land personally cultivated and recorded as Khudkasht before the vesting date is exempt from vesting...