Supreme Court Upholds Collector's Order in No-Confidence Motion Case — Resolution Validated for Ratification. The court found that the no-confidence motion must be ratified by the Special Gram Sabha as per the statutory provisions of the Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion against the Sarpanch of Karajkheda village, which was passed by the Gram Panchayat on 19.10.2020. Following this, the Sarpanch challenged the resolution before the Collector, who ordered a Special Gram Sabha to ratify the motion. The Sarpanch subsequently filed a writ petition in the High Court, which set aside both the Collector's order and the no-confidence resolution. The appellants, aggrieved by this decision, appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the High Court should not have invalidated the resolution but rather ensured compliance with the Collector's order. The respondent contended that the resolution lapsed due to failure to present it within the stipulated time frame as per government guidelines. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Village Panchayat Act, particularly Section 35-1A, and concluded that there was no legal basis for the resolution to lapse simply due to timing issues. The court emphasized that the no-confidence motion must be ratified by the Special Gram Sabha as directed by the Collector. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and reinstated the Collector's directive, mandating that the necessary steps for ratification be taken promptly. The court also ordered that the post of Sarpanch be held by the Upasarpanch until the resolution was ratified.

Headnote

A) Local Governance - No-Confidence Motion - Validity of Resolution - Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Section 35-1A - The court held that the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch must be ratified by the Special Gram Sabha as per the Collector's order, and the High Court's decision to set aside the resolution was incorrect. The court directed that the necessary formalities for ratification be complied with expeditiously (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the no-confidence resolution passed against the Sarpanch.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and directed that the no-confidence motion passed on 19.10.2020 be ratified by the Special Gram Sabha as per the Collector's order. The Collector was instructed to expedite the necessary formalities.

Law Points

  • No-confidence motion
  • Gram Sabha
  • Village Panchayat Act
  • statutory compliance
  • administrative instructions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (02) 241

Civil Appeal No. of 2021 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 1727 of 2021)

2021-02-26

A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari

Pravin V. Mandlik, Shirish K. Deshpande, Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Rana Sandeep Bussa, Gagandeep Sharma

Subhash & Ors.

Surekha Hanumant Bankar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's order setting aside a no-confidence resolution.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to reinstate the no-confidence resolution against the Sarpanch.

Filing Reason

The High Court invalidated the no-confidence resolution and the Collector's order.

Previous Decisions

The Collector's order directed a Special Gram Sabha to ratify the no-confidence motion.

Issues

Validity of the no-confidence resolution Compliance with statutory provisions for ratification

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the High Court should not have set aside the resolution. Respondent contended that the resolution lapsed due to timing issues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the no-confidence motion must be ratified by the Special Gram Sabha as per the statutory provisions, and the High Court erred in invalidating the resolution without legal basis.

Judgment Excerpts

The direction issued by the Collector in terms of order dated 31.12.2020, is in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Village Panchayat Act including amended Section 35-1A. The no-confidence resolution was challenged by the respondent No. 1 before the Collector, before the process of ratification could be taken forward.

Procedural History

The matter began with a no-confidence motion passed by the Gram Panchayat, followed by a challenge before the Collector, and subsequently a writ petition in the High Court which was appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Village Panchayat Act: Section 35-1A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Nature of Expenditure in Income Tax Case — Revenue Expenditure Affirmed.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Partnership Property Dispute — Civil Dispute Converted into Criminal Case. The Court held that allegations of theft, assault, and wrongful restraint between partners of a firm are essentially civil in n...