Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order on Housing Allotment — Invalid Registration Precludes Claim. The High Court's direction to allot a plot was erroneous as the respondent had no valid registration or right to claim allotment.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by the U.P. Housing & Development Board against a High Court order directing the allotment of a housing plot to the respondent, Namit Sharma, based on his grandfather's registration. The grandfather, Shri M.L. Sharma, had registered for a housing plot in 1982 but died in 1984 without any allotment being made. Following his death, the respondent's mother sought a refund of the registration amount instead of completing the necessary formalities for allotment. A Government order issued in 2002 invalidated old registrations, requiring applicants to re-register for new schemes. The respondent's attempts to transfer the registration and claim a plot were repeatedly denied by the Housing Commissioner, citing the invalidity of the registration. The respondent filed a writ petition which the High Court allowed, directing the Board to allot a plot. The Board appealed, arguing that the High Court erred in its decision as the respondent had no valid claim. The Supreme Court analyzed the procedural history and the Government order, concluding that the respondent's grandfather had never been allotted a plot and that the registration was invalid. The court emphasized that allotments were made through a draw of lots and that the respondent had not participated in this process. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside, dismissing the writ petition. The court highlighted the importance of following proper procedures for allotment and the implications of invalid registrations on claims for housing plots.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Housing Allotment - Validity of Registration - Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, Section 95(1) - The court held that the registration of the respondent's grandfather was rendered invalid by a Government order, thus negating any claim for allotment of a plot by the respondent. The High Court's direction to allot a plot was found to be erroneous as the respondent had no valid registration or right to claim allotment (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent had a valid claim for allotment of a housing plot based on the registration of his grandfather.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondent, ruling that the respondent had no valid claim for allotment due to the invalidity of the registration.

Law Points

  • Housing registration
  • plot allotment
  • Government order
  • legal standing
  • procedural compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (02) 216

Civil Appeal No.4020 of 2010

2021-02-03

Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy

Vishwajit Singh, Manish Singhvi

U.P. Housing & Development Board

Namit Sharma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against High Court order regarding housing plot allotment.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to quash the High Court's order directing plot allotment.

Filing Reason

Respondent claimed entitlement to a plot based on grandfather's registration.

Previous Decisions

High Court directed the allotment of a plot to the respondent.

Issues

Validity of registration for housing allotment Entitlement to claim based on deceased relative's registration

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the registration was invalid and no allotment was made. Respondent contended that the High Court's order was based on consent and prior allotment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the respondent could not claim allotment of a housing plot based on an invalid registration, emphasizing the necessity of following proper procedures for allotment.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court committed error in directing for allotment in favour of the respondent. There being no draw of lots in favour of Shri M.L. Sharma, the grandfather of the respondent, there is no question of allotment of any plot to the respondent.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the High Court's order dated 07.07.2009, which directed the allotment of a plot to the respondent based on his grandfather's registration.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam: Section 95(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Disposes of Habeas Corpus Petition for Minor Child Custody Based on Joint Compromise. Parties Agree to Terms of Settlement, Petition Disposed Without Adjudication on Merits.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Police Misconduct in Arrest of Couple for Abandoning Newborn - Court Issues Directions for Protection of Children and Guidelines for Police Conduct. The court held that police officials posing wit...