Supreme Court Directs Reopening of Anganwadi Centres for Nutritional Support Amid Pandemic. The court emphasized the statutory obligation of the government to provide nutritional support to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children under the National Food Security Act, 2013.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This writ petition was filed as a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging the closure of Anganwadi Centres across the country due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The petitioner, Dipika Jagatram Sahani, argued that these centres provide essential nutritional support to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children up to six years of age, which is crucial for their holistic development. The petitioner sought various reliefs, including the reopening of Anganwadi Centres and the provision of hot cooked meals and take-home rations as per the National Food Security Act, 2013. The court noted that the Integrated Child Development Services Scheme, launched in 1975, aimed to address the health and nutrition needs of young children and mothers. The National Food Security Act, 2013, further established statutory rights for nutritional support to these groups. The court highlighted the government's obligation to ensure food security and the importance of nutrition for the future generation. It observed that the closure of Anganwadi Centres during the pandemic had severely impacted the beneficiaries, leading to malnutrition and health issues. The court directed that all States and Union Territories must decide to reopen Anganwadi Centres by January 31, 2021, unless specifically directed otherwise by the State Disaster Management Authority. The court also mandated that nutritional standards as per Schedule II of the Act must be met and that a complaint redressal mechanism should be established to ensure beneficiaries receive their entitlements. The decision emphasized the need for immediate action to address the nutritional needs of vulnerable populations during the ongoing pandemic.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Food - Statutory Obligation to Provide Nutritional Support - National Food Security Act, 2013, Sections 4, 5, 6 - The court held that the government has a constitutional obligation to provide nutritional support to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children, and must ensure that Anganwadi Centres are operational to fulfill this duty. The court emphasized the importance of nutrition for the future generation and directed the reopening of Anganwadi Centres outside containment zones (Paras 17-34).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Anganwadi Centres should be reopened to provide nutritional support to beneficiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed all States/Union Territories to open Anganwadi Centres outside containment zones by January 31, 2021, ensuring compliance with nutritional standards as per the National Food Security Act, 2013.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Article 32
  • National Food Security Act
  • 2013
  • Integrated Child Development Services Scheme
  • statutory obligation
  • nutritional standards
  • right to food
  • right to health
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (01) 195

Civil Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1039 of 2020

2021-01-13

Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, M. R. Shah

Colin Gonsalves, Aishwarya Bhati

Dipika Jagatram Sahani

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging the closure of Anganwadi Centres.

Remedy Sought

Reopening of Anganwadi Centres and provision of nutritional support.

Filing Reason

Closure of Anganwadi Centres during the COVID-19 pandemic affecting nutritional support.

Previous Decisions

Court had previously issued directions for the protection of the right to food.

Issues

Whether the Anganwadi Centres should be reopened to provide nutritional support to beneficiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the closure of Anganwadi Centres has led to malnutrition among children and pregnant women. The Union of India submitted that guidelines for reopening Anganwadi Centres had been issued and some States had already resumed services.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the statutory obligation of the government to provide nutritional support to vulnerable populations, highlighting the importance of Anganwadi Centres in fulfilling this duty under the National Food Security Act, 2013.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the government has a constitutional obligation to provide nutritional support to pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children. The court emphasized the importance of nutrition for the future generation and directed the reopening of Anganwadi Centres outside containment zones.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed questioning the closure of Anganwadi Centres, and the court issued notice and directed the Union of India to file affidavits regarding the implementation of guidelines for Anganwadi services.

Acts & Sections

  • National Food Security Act, 2013: Sections 4, 5, 6
  • Integrated Child Development Services Scheme:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Assignment Matter — Upholds Non-Alienation Clause under Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Act to Protect Landless Assignees. Clause 6 Restriction on Sale or Alienation for 20 Years is Integral to Scheme of Surp...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.