Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Aadhaar Act Certification Due to Lack of Grounds. Review Petitions Challenging the Certification of the Aadhaar Act as a 'Money Bill' Under Article 110 Dismissed as No Case for Review Established.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed a series of review petitions challenging the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a 'Money Bill' under Article 110 of the Constitution. The petitions were filed following a final judgment dated 26.09.2018, which upheld the certification. The petitioners argued that the majority opinion in the earlier judgment was flawed and that the Aadhaar Act's certification violated constitutional norms. The court examined whether the Speaker's decision could be subject to judicial review and concluded that while such review is possible, the current petitions did not present sufficient grounds for review. The dissenting opinion emphasized the need for a larger bench to resolve the constitutional questions raised, particularly regarding the definition and implications of a 'Money Bill.' The majority ultimately dismissed the review petitions, asserting that changes in law or subsequent judgments do not constitute grounds for review. The dissenting judge argued for the necessity of awaiting a larger bench's determination on the issues raised, highlighting the potential consequences for judicial discipline and justice (Paras 1-14).

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Judicial Review of Legislative Certification - Scope of Judicial Review - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 110 - The court held that the decision of the Speaker certifying a Bill as a Money Bill is subject to judicial review if it breaches constitutional provisions. However, the majority dismissed the review petitions, stating that no grounds for review were established (Paras 1-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the review petitions against the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a 'Money Bill' under Article 110 of the Constitution should be allowed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions, stating that no case for review of the judgment dated 26.09.2018 was made out. The court emphasized that changes in law or subsequent decisions do not constitute grounds for review.

Law Points

  • Judicial review
  • Money Bill certification
  • Constitutional requirements
  • Review petitions
  • Legislative procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (01) 171

Review Petition (Civil) No. 45777/2018

2021-01-11

A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai

Beghar Foundation, Jairam Ramesh, M.G. Devasahayam, Mathew Thomas, Imtiyaz Ali Palsaniya, Shantha Sinha, S.G. Vombatkere

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petitions challenging the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to have the certification of the Aadhaar Act reviewed and overturned.

Filing Reason

Petitioners argued that the certification violated constitutional norms.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court had previously upheld the certification of the Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill.

Issues

Whether the Speaker's certification of the Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill is subject to judicial review. Whether the review petitions presented sufficient grounds for review.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that the majority opinion in the earlier judgment was flawed and unconstitutional. The respondents argued that the review petitions did not establish any grounds for review.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while the Speaker's certification of a Money Bill could be subject to judicial review, the review petitions did not present sufficient grounds for such a review.

Judgment Excerpts

Permission to file Review Petition(s) is granted. In our opinion, no case for review of judgment and order dated 26.09.2018 is made out. The obligation placed on the Speaker of the Lok Sabha to certify whether a Bill is a Money Bill is not a mere matter of 'procedure'. The correctness of the judgment in Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5J.)... will be resolved by a larger bench.

Procedural History

The review petitions were filed against the final judgment dated 26.09.2018. The petitions were pending when a reference was made to a larger bench in Rojer Mathew.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 110
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Rally Organizers for Lack of Prima Facie Offence Under IPC and Police Act. Peaceful Dharna Without Permission Did Not Constitute Public Nuisance or Wrongful Restraint Under Sections 290 and 341 IPC a...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property.