Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Armed Forces Tribunal Order on One Rank One Pension. The court ruled that personnel of the Army Postal Service are not entitled to OROP as they are governed by civil pension rules.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal challenged an order from the Armed Forces Tribunal which granted One Rank One Pension (OROP) to Lt. Col. Om Dutt Sharma (Retd.) and his legal heirs. The deceased respondent had served in the Army Postal Service (APS) and claimed OROP based on his military rank. The court noted that the respondents were non-gazetted officers in the Department of Posts and were on deputation to the APS. The deceased respondent relinquished his commission in the Army in 1984 and retired in 1985, while the intervenors claimed similar benefits. The appellants argued that the respondents were governed by civil pension rules and not entitled to OROP, as their pensions were higher than their counterparts in the Department of Posts. The court analyzed various Army Instructions and concluded that the respondents, despite their military ranks, retained their lien in the Department of Posts and were entitled only to civil pensions. The court emphasized that the OROP benefit was applicable only to those drawing pensions from Defence establishments. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order and ruling that the respondents were not entitled to OROP.

Headnote

A) Pension Law - One Rank One Pension - Eligibility of Army Postal Service personnel - Government of India, Circular dated 7th November, 2015 - The court held that personnel of the Army Postal Service, despite holding military ranks, are governed by civil pension rules and are not entitled to One Rank One Pension as they do not draw pension from Defence establishments (Paras 26-26).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents, who served in the Army Postal Service, are entitled to the benefit of One Rank One Pension.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the respondents are not entitled to One Rank One Pension as they are governed by civil pension rules and do not draw pensions from Defence establishments.

Law Points

  • One Rank One Pension
  • Armed Forces Tribunal
  • pension eligibility
  • civil service rules
  • military service pay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (11) 196

Civil Appeal No. 8139 of 2019 (Diary No. 38432 of 2017)

2019-11-05

Hemant Gupta, L. Nageswara Rao

Huzefa Ahmadi

Union of India & Ors.

Lt. Col. Om Dutt Sharma (Retd.) Dead Through LRS & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the Armed Forces Tribunal's order regarding pension entitlement.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to overturn the Tribunal's order granting OROP.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the deceased respondent's entitlement to OROP.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent.

Issues

Entitlement to One Rank One Pension for Army Postal Service personnel Applicability of civil vs military pension rules

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that respondents are governed by civil pension rules and not entitled to OROP. Respondents contended that they are entitled to OROP as they held military ranks.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that personnel of the Army Postal Service, despite holding military ranks, are governed by civil pension rules and are not entitled to One Rank One Pension as they do not draw pension from Defence establishments.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that personnel of the Army Postal Service, despite holding military ranks, are governed by civil pension rules and are not entitled to One Rank One Pension as they do not draw pension from Defence establishments. The appeal is allowed.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal dated 9th February, 2017, which granted OROP to the respondent.

Acts & Sections

  • Ex-servicemen (Re-employment in Central Civil Services and Posts) Rules, 1979:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Determines Just Compensation for Land Acquisition in Moradabad at Rs.35,000 per Acre. Uniform Market Value Fixed for 171.46 Acres Acquired for UPSIDC Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Rejecting District Court's Future Potentiality Findi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Excise Matter — Tribunal's Findings Affirmed. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the appellant satisfied the requirements for not taking Modvat credit on inputs used in exempted goods under Rul...