Supreme Court Allows Revocation of Probate in Property Dispute Case — Citation Not Issued to Legal Heirs. The court found that the probate was granted without issuing citation to the legal heirs, which is a just cause for revocation under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against the dismissal of the appellant's application for revocation of probate granted in favor of Bachittar Singh Randhawa concerning the Will of Surjan Singh Randhawa. The appellant, Manju Puri, is the daughter of Beena Kumari Mehra, who was a legal heir of Surjan Singh Randhawa. The probate was granted on 04.06.1982 without issuing citation to Beena Kumari Mehra, who later filed a partition suit in 1984 claiming her share in the property. The appellant contended that the no objection certificate allegedly signed by her mother was forged and that she was unaware of the probate proceedings until 2011. The Single Judge rejected the revocation application citing inordinate delay and the mother's consent during her lifetime. The Division Bench upheld this decision. The Supreme Court found that the High Court erred in concluding that there was inordinate delay, as the appellant filed her application promptly after discovering the probate records. The court emphasized that the issuance of citation to legal heirs is necessary, especially when the Will alters the devolution of property. The court concluded that the probate granted without citation was unsustainable and allowed the revocation application, setting aside the previous orders of the High Court.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Revocation of Probate - Grounds for Revocation - Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 263 - The court held that the probate was granted without issuing citation to the legal heirs, which is a just cause for revocation. The appellant was not aware of the probate proceedings and the consent of her mother was obtained under false pretenses, thus justifying the revocation of probate (Paras 36-37).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sufficient grounds were made out in the application for revocation of probate filed by the appellant and whether the High Court committed error in rejecting the application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court, and granted the application for revocation of probate, reviving the probate proceedings for further consideration.

Law Points

  • Revocation of probate
  • Citation requirements
  • Consent of legal heirs
  • Discretion of District Judge
  • Delay in filing application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (11) 150

Civil Appeal No. 8455 of 2019

2019-11-12

Ashok Bhushan

Shri Siddharth Luthra, Shri Jayant Bhushan, Shri Jishnu Saha

Manju Puri

Rajiv Singh Hanspal & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding revocation of probate

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought revocation of probate granted in favor of Bachittar Singh Randhawa

Filing Reason

Appellant claimed ignorance of probate proceedings and alleged forgery of no objection certificate

Previous Decisions

Single Judge rejected revocation application; Division Bench upheld rejection

Issues

Whether the probate was granted without proper citation to legal heirs Whether the appellant had sufficient grounds for revocation of probate

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that no citation was issued to her mother, a legal heir, and that the no objection certificate was forged. Respondents contended that the issuance of citation was not mandatory as the mother had consented to the probate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the absence of citation to legal heirs in probate proceedings constitutes a just cause for revocation under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court emphasized the necessity of issuing citation to ensure that all interested parties are notified and can contest the probate.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the probate was granted without issuing citation to the legal heirs, which is a just cause for revocation. The observation of the High Court that there was inordinate delay is unsustainable. The probate granted without issuance of such citation in the facts of the present case deserves to be revoked.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application for revocation of probate which was rejected by the Single Judge on 24.08.2015. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal against this order on 13.04.2017, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 263, Section 283
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Bicyclist Killed by Rash Driving; Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Modified. Notional Income of Deceased Farmer and Garage Owner Raised to Rs.4,500/- per Mont...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and ...