Supreme Court Restores Interest Rate Awarded by Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute — Repealed Provisions Not Applicable. The court found that the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940, including the U.P. Amendment Act, were not applicable to proceedings commenced after the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into force.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by M/s. Shahi and Associates against the State of U.P. regarding the reduction of interest awarded by an Arbitrator. The appellant, a registered partnership firm engaged in civil construction, entered into an agreement with the Superintendent Engineer for work on the Gola Pump House on 08.07.1993. Disputes regarding payment for additional work led the appellant to invoke arbitration on 11.09.1999, resulting in the appointment of an Arbitrator on 12.10.1999. The Arbitrator awarded Rs. 17,86,339 with interest at 18% p.a. on 24.12.2001. The respondents challenged this award, leading to a District Judge's ruling that upheld the award but reduced the interest to 6% p.a. based on the U.P. Amendment Act. Both parties appealed to the High Court, which dismissed their appeals, agreeing with the District Judge's decision. The appellant contended that the U.P. Amendment Act was obsolete due to the repeal of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and that the interest should remain at 18% p.a. The court analyzed the applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which had repealed the previous Act and determined that the proceedings commenced under the new Act. The court concluded that the U.P. Amendment Act did not apply, thus restoring the interest rate awarded by the Arbitrator. The appeal was allowed, and the previous judgments regarding the interest rate were set aside, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Interest Rate - Applicability of Interest Rate under the Act - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 31(7)(b) - The court held that the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940, including the U.P. Amendment Act, were not applicable to proceedings commenced after the Act of 1996 came into force, thus restoring the interest rate awarded by the Arbitrator at 18% p.a. (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reduction of interest from 18% p.a. to 6% p.a. by the High Court was justified under the U.P. Amendment Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, restoring the interest rate awarded by the Arbitrator at 18% p.a. and setting aside the judgments of the High Court and District Judge regarding the reduction of interest.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Interest Rate
  • Repeal of Statute
  • Applicability of Law
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (08) 235

Civil Appeal No. 3559 of 2010

2019-08-08

S. Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah

M/s Shahi and Associates

State of U.P. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the reduction of interest awarded by an Arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the interest rate awarded by the Arbitrator.

Filing Reason

Dispute over the rate of interest on the awarded sum.

Previous Decisions

The District Judge reduced the interest from 18% p.a. to 6% p.a., upheld by the High Court.

Issues

Applicability of the U.P. Amendment Act Correctness of interest rate awarded

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the U.P. Amendment Act was obsolete and the interest should remain at 18% p.a. The respondent justified the reduction of interest based on the U.P. Amendment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the U.P. Amendment Act do not apply to proceedings commenced after the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into force, thus the interest awarded by the Arbitrator at 18% p.a. was justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal, therefore, succeeds and it is accordingly allowed. The interest awarded by the Arbitrator in accordance with Section 31(7)(b) of the Act of 1996 is restored.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal against the High Court's judgment which upheld the District Judge's decision to reduce the interest awarded by the Arbitrator.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: 31(7)(b)
  • Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976: 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bihar Health Service Recruitment Case — Clarifies Definition of Government Hospital for Work Experience. The court ruled that the definition of 'Government hospital' must include hospitals run by the Central Governmen...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute — Upholds Rights of Allottees Over Surplus Land. The court found that the retrospective application of Section 51A could not divest the allottees' rights without a hearing.