High Court Quashes Proceedings Under Negotiable Instruments Act Due to Account Blockage. The court found that the cheque was dishonoured due to the account being blocked following the death of a partner, which does not constitute an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash proceedings initiated against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner, V.B. Nagaraj, contended that the cheque in question was returned due to the account being blocked following the death of a partner, T.M. Prabhakaraiah, which occurred on 21.05.2017. The complainant, a supplier of fertilizers and pesticides, had presented a cheque dated 28.03.2018, which was returned with the endorsement 'account blocked'. The petitioner argued that the firm ceased to exist upon the death of one partner, and thus, the cheque could not be considered valid. The respondent's counsel contended that the death of the partner was not communicated and that the cheque was post-dated. The court analyzed the legal implications of the death of a partner under the Partnership Act and the conditions under which Section 138 of the NI Act could be invoked. It referenced several precedents, including the Supreme Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Seth Govindram Sugar Mills and the Delhi High Court's decision in Farhad Suri v. Praveen Choudhary, which clarified that an account blocked due to a partner's death does not fall under the ambit of Section 138. Ultimately, the court concluded that the cheque was invalid due to the circumstances surrounding its issuance and the account's status, leading to the quashing of the proceedings against the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The court quashed the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act as the cheque was dishonoured due to the account being blocked following the death of a partner, which does not constitute an offence under the Act. The court held that the essential ingredient of dishonour due to insufficiency of funds was not established, thus quashing the proceedings (Paras 10-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Trial Court erred in taking cognizance for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the endorsement 'account blocked'?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was allowed, and the initiation of proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act against the petitioner was quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of proceedings
  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • Partnership Act
  • Death of partner
  • Account blockage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (09) 61

CRL.P No. 4428 of 2019

2026-09-25

H.P. Sandesh

B.M. Halaswamy, K. Palanimuthu

V.B. Nagaraj

M/S. Peregrine Phosphate (P) Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the proceedings initiated against him.

Filing Reason

Proceedings initiated due to dishonour of cheque.

Issues

Whether the Trial Court erred in taking cognizance for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act due to the endorsement 'account blocked'?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cheque was dishonoured due to account blockage following the death of a partner, thus not attracting Section 138. Respondent contended that the cheque was post-dated and the death of the partner was not communicated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the dishonour of a cheque due to an account being blocked following the death of a partner does not constitute an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the essential ingredient of dishonour due to insufficiency of funds was not established.

Judgment Excerpts

The court quashed the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act as the cheque was dishonoured due to the account being blocked following the death of a partner. The essential ingredient of dishonour due to insufficiency of funds was not established.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.25126/2018 pending before the XLII Additional CMM at Bengaluru.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Section 138
  • Partnership Act, 1932: Section 25, Section 31, Section 42
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Compulsory Retirement of Forester — Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Competence and Violation of Natural Justice.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.