High Court Upholds University Resolution on Employee Termination — Statutory Compliance Affirmed. The court confirmed that the rejection of termination was valid under Statute No.53 of the university's regulations.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by a society challenging a resolution passed by the Management Council of Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University regarding the termination of an Assistant Professor's services. The petitioner, Jagadambha Bahu Uddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha, represented by its Vice-President, contested the resolution dated 27.03.2024, which rejected the termination of respondent No.3, an Assistant Professor in Chemistry. The respondent was appointed on 21st June 2016 at a private unaided college affiliated with the university. On 25th December 2020, the respondent left the college without permission during an exam period, prompting a notice from the Principal. The following day, the respondent attempted suicide in the college laboratory, recording a video statement blaming the Secretary and Principal for his actions. The court analyzed the university's resolution in light of statutory compliance and the circumstances surrounding the respondent's conduct. The court ultimately upheld the university's decision, affirming that the rejection of the termination was in accordance with the relevant statutes. The judgment was pronounced on 29th September 2026, following a hearing on 4th September 2026.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Termination of Services - Justification for Termination - Statute No.53 of Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University - The petition challenged the rejection of termination of an Assistant Professor's services, citing procedural compliance with university statutes. The court upheld the resolution, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for termination. Held that the university's decision was valid and justified (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of the respondent was justified under the applicable statutes.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the university's resolution rejecting the termination of the respondent's services as valid under the applicable statutes.

Law Points

  • Termination of services
  • University regulations
  • Statutory compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (09) 187

Writ Petition No.3868 of 2024

2026-09-29

Nandesh S. Deshpande

B.G. Kulkarni, Gouri Venkatraman, Mir Nagman Ali

Jagadambha Bahu Uddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha

Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging university's resolution on employee termination.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to overturn the university's resolution rejecting termination.

Filing Reason

Alleged improper rejection of termination of services of an Assistant Professor.

Issues

Justification for termination of services Compliance with university statutes

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the termination was necessary due to misconduct. Respondents maintained that the termination was not justified under the statutes.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of statutory compliance in employment termination processes, affirming that the university's decision was justified under its regulations.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed challenging resolution item No.57, dated 27.03.2024, passed by the Management Council of the respondent No.1 University. The court upheld the resolution, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for termination.

Procedural History

The petition was filed challenging the university's resolution on 27.03.2024, with hearings conducted on 4th September 2026 and judgment pronounced on 29th September 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University Statutes: Statute No.53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Eligibility Certificates Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 — Holds That Industrial Units Commencing Production After 1.1.1999 Are Entitled to Benefits Under the Scheme Despite Government Resolu...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Ter...