High Court Sets Aside De-registration of Co-operative Society Due to Jurisdictional Errors. Members Cannot Seek De-registration as a Remedy for Grievances Against the Managing Committee.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a challenge to the order dated 19 December 2019 by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, which allowed an application for de-registration of a society based on alleged misrepresentation during its registration. The petitioners, Capt. Rajeev Kumar and others, contested this order, which was later confirmed by the Hon’ble Minister on 17 March 2021. The petition was admitted on 16 December 2024, and an interim stay was granted against the de-registration order. The court examined whether members of a society could seek de-registration based on grievances against the managing committee. It concluded that such actions were self-destructive and not intended by the legislature under Section 21A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court highlighted that remedies for grievances against the managing committee existed within the Act, and de-registration should not be a recourse for dissatisfied members. The court found that the Registrar had erred in exercising jurisdiction under Section 21A, as the alleged discrepancies in registration documents did not amount to misrepresentation. The court set aside both the Registrar's and the Minister's orders, allowing the writ petition and making the rule absolute without costs. Consequently, the contempt petition and interim application were disposed of as nothing survived from them.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Societies - De-registration - Self-destructive approach - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Section 21A - Members of a society cannot seek de-registration of the society they belong to as a remedy for grievances against the managing committee, as it is a self-destructive action. The court held that such actions are not intended by the legislature under Section 21A (Paras 6-7).

B) Co-operative Societies - Misrepresentation - Definition and scope - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Section 21A - Mere discrepancies in registration documents do not constitute misrepresentation warranting de-registration. The court emphasized that misrepresentation must be of such nature that it would have prevented registration if known (Paras 10-11).

C) Co-operative Societies - Available remedies - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Aggrieved members must utilize available remedies under the Act rather than seeking extreme measures like de-registration. The court noted that disputes among members should be resolved through prescribed remedies, not by dismantling the society (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether members of a co-operative society can seek de-registration of the society based on grievances against the managing committee?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the order dated 19 December 2019 passed by the Registrar and the order dated 17 March 2021 passed by the Hon’ble Minister, allowing the writ petition and making the rule absolute without costs.

Law Points

  • De-registration of societies
  • Misrepresentation
  • Remedies under MCS Act
  • Section 21A
  • Section 152
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (09) 162

WP 3162 of 2021

2026-09-28

SANDEEP V. MARNE

Mr. G. N. Salunke, Mr. N. V. Walawalkar, Ms. Vrushali L. Maindad, Mr. S. H. Kankal

Capt. Rajeev Kumar and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the de-registration of a co-operative society

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside the de-registration order

Filing Reason

Alleged misrepresentation during the registration of the society

Previous Decisions

De-registration order confirmed by the Hon’ble Minister

Issues

Can members of a co-operative society seek de-registration based on grievances against the managing committee? What constitutes misrepresentation under Section 21A of the MCS Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the de-registration was unwarranted and based on insufficient grounds. Respondents contended that discrepancies in registration documents justified the de-registration.

Ratio Decidendi

Members of a co-operative society cannot seek de-registration of the society they belong to as a remedy for grievances against the managing committee. Misrepresentation must be of such nature that it would have prevented registration if known, and mere discrepancies do not suffice.

Judgment Excerpts

Seeking de-registration of a co-operative society by its very member is akin to cutting the branch of the tree on which he sits. Mere discrepancies in registration documents do not constitute misrepresentation warranting de-registration. If members of the society are aggrieved by the manner in which affairs of the society are being conducted, there are several remedies provided for in the MCS Act.

Procedural History

The petition was filed challenging the Registrar's order of de-registration dated 19 December 2019, which was confirmed by the Hon’ble Minister on 17 March 2021. The petition was admitted on 16 December 2024, with an interim stay granted on 7 May 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 21A, Section 152
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal's Award for Death of Broiler Hens in Road Accident; Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal on Interest Rate. Broiler Hens Held to be Livestock and Goods Covered Under Third-Party Property Damage Policy Under Motor Veh...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic ...