High Court Upholds Conviction in Homicide Case — Dying Declarations Found Reliable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant was accused of fatally assaulting the deceased, Hasruddin Sarafuddin Shaikh, during an altercation after a night of drinking. The incident occurred on 21.05.2013 in Daman, where both individuals were fruit sellers and room partners. Following the assault, the deceased was found injured and later succumbed to his injuries on 04.06.2013. The prosecution relied heavily on the dying declarations made by the deceased to several witnesses, which were contested by the appellant on grounds of reliability and the absence of a magistrate during the recording. The court analyzed the medical evidence, including the nature of the injuries and the cause of death, concluding that the injuries were sufficient to cause death and that the dying declarations were credible. The court upheld the conviction, emphasizing that the passage of time between the assault and death did not absolve the appellant of liability for murder. The final decision affirmed the lower court's ruling, sentencing the appellant to life imprisonment and a fine.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability of Dying Declaration - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The court examined the evidentiary value of multiple dying declarations made by the deceased to various witnesses, concluding that they were consistent and credible, thereby supporting the conviction of the appellant. Held that the absence of a magistrate during the recording of the dying declaration does not invalidate its evidentiary value (Paras 12-24).

B) Criminal Law - Causation - Establishing Causation in Homicide - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - The court held that the death of the deceased was a direct result of the injuries inflicted by the appellant, despite the death occurring days later due to septicemia, affirming that the appellant was liable for murder under Section 302 IPC (Paras 20-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declarations made by the deceased were reliable and whether the injuries inflicted by the appellant caused the death of the deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the lower court's judgment and sentencing the appellant to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500.

Law Points

  • homicide
  • dying declaration
  • evidentiary value
  • medical evidence
  • causation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (09) 110

Cr.A.234-2018

2026-09-22

Shreeram V. Shirsat

Nafeesa Khan, Sheeba Khan, N.V. Khan, Samer Sharif, Amit Munde, Ashwin Thool, Archishmati Chandramore

Tahir Khan S/o Tasbbar Khan Pathan

State of Maharashtra, Union Territory of Daman

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks to overturn conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Previous Decisions

Conviction upheld by Sessions Court.

Issues

Reliability of dying declarations Causation of death in relation to inflicted injuries

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution established credibility of dying declarations. Defense argued lack of reliability and absence of magistrate during recording.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that dying declarations can be relied upon even if not recorded before a magistrate, provided they are consistent and credible. The passage of time between the assault and death does not absolve the accused of liability if the injuries were sufficient to cause death.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Appeal has been filed challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 24.05.2017. The Appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The court examined the evidentiary value of multiple dying declarations made by the deceased. The death of the deceased was a direct result of the injuries inflicted by the appellant. The passage of time between the assault and death does not absolve the appellant of liability for murder.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court on 24.05.2017 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appeal was filed against this conviction.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses CBI Appeal Against Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case of Conspiracy Established Against Managing Director Based on Diary Entries and Lack of Direct Evidence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Conviction — Technical Grounds Insufficient for Retrial.