High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Pay Revision as Prayer Complied. Compliance with the petitioner's request for pay step-up and pension sanction rendered the writ petition moot.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by R. Kalyanasundaram under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the second and third respondents to step up his pay scale from Rs. 55700 to Rs. 57400 and to prepare a proposal for revision of pay and pension arrears. The petitioner contended that he was entitled to annual increments due from the year 2020, in accordance with a government letter dated 06.02.2019, and requested that his representation dated 11.05.2020 be considered for pension sanction. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the prayer sought had been complied with, indicating that the issues raised in the petition had been resolved. Consequently, the court found that there was no further matter to adjudicate, leading to the disposal of the writ petition without costs. The judgment was delivered by Justice C. Kumarappan on 20-08-2026.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Compliance with Prayer - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for stepping up of pay scale and pension sanction. During the pendency of the writ petition, the prayer was complied with, leading to the dismissal of the petition as nothing survives. Held that the compliance rendered the petition moot (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to step up of pay scale and pension sanction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was dismissed as the prayer sought by the petitioner was complied with during the pendency of the case, resulting in no further issues to adjudicate.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Pay Revision
  • Annual Increments
  • Pension Sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (08) 237

WP No. 2637 of 2022

2026-08-20

C.Kumarappan

P.Ganesan, V.Sivalingam, A.N.R.Jayaprathap

R.Kalyanasundaram

The State of Tamil Nadu and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for pay scale adjustment and pension sanction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for pay step-up and pension sanction.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed entitlement to pay revision and pension based on government directives.

Issues

Entitlement to pay step-up Pension sanction compliance

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for pay revision and pension sanction based on government letter. Respondents complied with the petitioner's request during the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that compliance with the petitioner's request rendered the writ petition moot, as there were no remaining issues to resolve.

Judgment Excerpts

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to step up of the scale of pay of the petitioner from Rs 55700/- to Rs. 57400. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Standing Counsel for the 4th respondent. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed, the respondents were heard, and the petitioner's prayer was complied with during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Regrant of Watan Land Under Maharashtra Pargana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950 — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi and Petition Barred by Delay. The court held that a subsequent purchaser cann...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction for Pouring Kerosene and Setting Victim on Fire Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.