High Court Allows Employee to Participate in Transfer Counselling — Interim Stay Granted.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, C. Ramalakshmi, challenging the orders dated 21.08.2024 and 22.08.2024 issued by the respondents, which affected her posting. The petitioner sought to quash these orders and requested to be posted in a village office closer to her residence. The court noted that an interim stay had been granted on 09.09.2024, allowing the petitioner to remain in her current posting at Kallur. During the proceedings, both the petitioner’s counsel and the Government Advocate agreed that the petitioner should be allowed to participate in the upcoming transfer counselling for 2026, given her service duration at her current posting. The court, without addressing the merits of the case, decided to dispose of the writ petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to participate in the transfer counselling while allowing her to continue in her current position until then. The writ petition was disposed of with the aforementioned observations, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Participation in Transfer Counselling - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court permitted the petitioner to participate in the transfer counselling for the year 2026, considering her long service in the current posting and the interim stay in place. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but allowed the petitioner to continue in her current position until the counselling (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner should be allowed to participate in the transfer counselling for the year 2026 despite challenging the impugned orders.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to participate in the transfer counselling for 2026 and permitting her to continue in her current posting until then.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • interim stay
  • transfer counselling
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (08) 222

WP No. 26475 of 2024

2026-08-17

C. Kumarappan

P. Ebenezer Paul, Mr. V. Sivalingam

C. Ramalakshmi

The Government of Tamil Nadu, The District Collector, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub Collector

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging administrative orders affecting employment posting.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash orders and be posted closer to residence.

Filing Reason

Challenging the orders dated 21.08.2024 and 22.08.2024.

Previous Decisions

Interim stay granted on 09.09.2024 allowing continued posting.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be allowed to participate in transfer counselling despite challenging the orders.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought permission to participate in transfer counselling. Government Advocate agreed to allow participation due to long service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of allowing participation in transfer counselling while maintaining the status quo of the petitioner's posting.

Judgment Excerpts

the petitioner may be permitted to participate in the ensuing transfer counselling for the year 2026 this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the liberty to the petitioner to participate in the ensuing transfer counselling for the year 2026

Procedural History

Writ Petition filed challenging orders, interim stay granted, court allowed participation in transfer counselling.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Customs for Demurrage Charges Due to Delay in Assessment. Customs Department Directed to Bear Warehousing Charges for Inordinate Delay in Finalising Assessment of Imported Goods.